- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
I ran into a problem with the intel fortran compiler on windows.
Compiler Version:
Intel(R) Visual Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 19.1.3.311 Build 20201010_000000
OS:
Windows 10.
Here is a small program that illustrates the problem (OMPBug.f90):
!=====================================================================
MODULE recTaskCall
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE rec_in (nlevels)
INTEGER :: nlevels
!$OMP PARALLEL SHARED(nlevels) DEFAULT(NONE)
!$OMP SINGLE
CALL rec_low(0)
!$OMP END SINGLE
!$OMP END PARALLEL
CONTAINS
RECURSIVE SUBROUTINE rec_low(idepth)
INTEGER :: idepth
IF (idepth== nlevels) RETURN
!$OMP TASK
CALL rec_low(idepth+1)
!$OMP END TASK
END SUBROUTINE
END SUBROUTINE
END MODULE
PROGRAM testme
USE recTaskCall
CALL rec_in(3)
END PROGRAM
!============================================================
After compiling the program with
ifort OMPBug.f90 /traceback /Qopenmp /debug
and running the exe, I get an access violation when nlevels is accessed from the call to rec_in within the openmp task construct.
It worked with gfortran and I did not get a compile time error so I assume this is valid code,... I might be wrong. However, it seems that with the intel compiler the host association is lost within the openmp construct.
Is there an obvious solution I am missing? I am aware, that I can pass nlevels and the problem goes away. However, with the variables in my real code this strategy leads to a stackoverflow that is not easily fixed.
Best regards
Flo
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Unfortunately, copy/paste isn't working for me to grab your code.
Does your small program work if you compile with /Qopenmp-stubs? That turns your program into a sequential program. It's a handy compiler option for debugging OpenMP applications.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Oh good grief, the forum changes broke that too. You can select the text but as soon as you try to copy it, the selection disappears.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
When you compile without Qopenmp, the OpenMP directives are considered comments and ignored.
When compiling with Qopenmp and the stubs library the OpenMP directives are processed and the stubs library is actually used and the app runs serially.
![](/skins/images/45C6C2D737ED71F4C51F0145C8CB1E9C/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page