- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Informe de contenido inapropiado
Just wanted to let you know that the ordering of optional parameters for this routine (NNPLG)in the IMSL manual is wrong. After spending much time, it turns out that the correct order is as follows:
1) N
2) XGUESS
3) IPRINT
4) MAXITN
....
1) N
2) XGUESS
3) IPRINT
4) MAXITN
....
- Etiquetas:
- Intel® Fortran Compiler
Enlace copiado
1 Responder
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Informe de contenido inapropiado
DEL0 and TAU0 are also in reversed order. The argument list is:
(s_fcn, s_grad, m, me, ibtype, xlb, xub, x,&
n, xguess, iprint, maxitn, del0, tau0,&
smallw, delmin, scfmax, fvalue)
Using keyword names for optional arguments would avoid problems here, or you can read the declaration in numerical_libraries_f90.f90 in the IMSL include folder.
I will pass on your report to Rogue Wave.
(s_fcn, s_grad, m, me, ibtype, xlb, xub, x,&
n, xguess, iprint, maxitn, del0, tau0,&
smallw, delmin, scfmax, fvalue)
Using keyword names for optional arguments would avoid problems here, or you can read the declaration in numerical_libraries_f90.f90 in the IMSL include folder.
I will pass on your report to Rogue Wave.
Responder
Opciones de temas
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Marcar tema como nuevo
- Marcar tema como leído
- Flotar este Tema para el usuario actual
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Página de impresión sencilla