- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi all,
yes, I know there have been similar threads in the past, but I did not find a final answer to this problem. Compiling the H264 and MPEG4 decoders from Intel IPP 6.1.6 (taken from the 6.1.6 samples) in Visual Studio produces some warnings when the "Detect 64bit portability issues" is turned on for the compiler. The H264 decoder produces 5 warnings of type "conversion from type size_t to Ipp32s(u), possible loss of data". The MPEG4 decoder produces 6 warnings - same as above. Additionaly it produces some "pointer truncation" and "int to pointer conversion" warnings for the _ALIGN16 macro, but these are obviously harmless because there is a special 64bit version of this macro under an #ifdef.
1. Can anybody confirm that the size_t conversion warnings are harmless when compiling for a 64 bit platform?
2. Does anybody know if upgrading to IPP 7 helps to get rid of the warnings?
Thanks
Alex
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The MPEG4 decoder produces 6 warnings - same as above...
1. Can anybody confirm that the size_t conversion warnings are harmless when compiling for a 64 bit platform?
[SergeyK] There are 11 warnings in total and I would investigate every case because on a 64-bit platform that loss of data
could create problems.
Please take a look at a thread:
Tips for Porting software to a 64-bit platform
http://redfort-software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=106025&o=a&s=lr
Best regards,
Sergey
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thank you very much for your reply. However, it does not really answer my question. In particular, I would like to know if Intel is concerned about these warnings, with other words, can we consider the sample code provided by Intel to be 64-bit compatible? Or are we on our own here to investigate the 64 bit compiler warnings to create a 64 bit compatible code? I also hoped that anybody tried to run these decoders on Win64 so that we can hear some experience.
Thanks for your patience.
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
[SergeyK] I can't answer. There is a possibility that Intel software developer simply didn't see that warning
because a Warning Level was set to 1, 2 or 3 in a Visual Studio.
...Can we consider the sample code provided by Intel to be 64-bit compatible?
[SergeyK] I think Yes. However, you need to test and verify it on a 64-bit platform. Unfortunately, you didn't provide
a piece of code(s) that generates one of these compatibility warnings. It is really hard to say if there is some "danger"...
Or are we on our own here to investigate the 64 bit compiler warnings to create a 64 bit compatible code?
[SergeyK] Please see above.
Best regards,
Sergey
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I had a quick look at the 7.0.X samples I can see that these warnings have been removed. All the cases with size_t to int conversion have been solved by adding type casts like (Ipp32s) before the size_t value. For anybody who might be interested, this means that the 64bit compiler warnings generated by VS for the 6.1.6 samples are harmless, becase adding the type casts in 7.0.X samples indicates that the size_t variables will not overflow the int range.
Thanks for your replies and have a nice day.
Alex

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page