Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives
Deliberate problems developing high-performance vision, signal, security, and storage applications.

IJL vs. IPP

macom2005
Beginner
500 Views
Hi,
i am using IJL 2.0 from IPP 4.1 and have good results. The speed of jpeg encode / decode increase about 140% compared to delphi standard. I am thinking about using the IPP Jpeg functions instead of IJL. My questions :
- Is it worth to do the work. Can this speed up my program again ?
- Are there delphi headers available to use this ippi functions ?
Thx!
0 Kudos
2 Replies
macom2005
Beginner
500 Views
No answer on this issue ?
0 Kudos
Vladimir_Dudnik
Employee
500 Views
Hi,
I'm sorry for delay with answering, just was very busy last days. Of course, we have answer. In general, so-called IPP JPEG codec will be faster than IJL (even based on IPP), because of more efficient implementation. But regarding Delphi support - we do not have plan to provide such support in the nearest release, so if you are interested in it you can:
a) submit this feature request through premier.intel.com and we will consider if it fits our resources and plans
b) to implement Delphi interface by yourself
In any case, I recommend you to take a look on JPEGView sample, which contains new IPP JPEG codec implementation to estimate its performance and functionality. You can download JPEG samples through this link
Regards,
Vladimir
0 Kudos
Reply