- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I see the thread (30224954).
The problems happen to me.
When will fix the problem?
And, I want know why compression ratio is different with zlib.
ipp_zlib compress time was faster than zlib's time.
But, compress ratio was poor.
For example, I compressed the text file with 5,451,280 bytes.
zlib's result was 2,288,925 bytes, and ipp_zlib's result was 2.910.723.
Why compression ratio was different in spite of compression level was same?
deflate compressing method wasn't standards?
Finally, I could build binary (exe) file with static link.
But I couldn't build static lib file as same.
First, I made static library project file with visual studio .net 2003.
And then add ipp_zlib.h and ipp_zlib.c.
And I add ippcorel.lib, ipp*merged.lib files and ipp_px.h into the project.
In this case, I couldn't build the my own ipp_zlib.lib static library.
It wasnever finish the compile.
How I can build the just static library.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
I recommend you to take new version of that sample from IPP 5.2 beta. Now it was implemented as a "patch" to original zlib library, so it should provide better compatbility.
Regards,
Vladimir

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page