Intel® Optane™ Memory
Support for Issues Related to Intel® Optane™ Memory
Want to learn how Intel® Optane™ Memory can help your business? Talk to our Expert!

Looking for our RealSense Community? Click HERE

The Intel® SSD Toolbox and Intel® Data Center Tool are now End-Of-Life, see for more information and replacements tools here
1354 Discussions

Is it actually to let Optane boot a non-boot drive with the work-around I saw elsewhere?


Hello and thanks for the help.


I ordered an Optane-drive "by accident" because since I read about SSD caching I thought that seemed smart whereas I wasn't too interested in just having a small SSD area and then lots of slow space. I thought Intel had removed that technology though because I no longer saw it advertised but then came Optane and there it was refreshed. I had ordered the i5 8400 and i7 8700K before (on release day) but one store had an offer with 1000 SEK back if one ordered for over 5000 SEK 1-2 weeks before Black Friday weekend so to go with something I went with i7 8700K and a 32 GB Optane drive as filler since I wanted to boost my 3 TB HDD or some other HDD anyway. I do have an EVO 850 250 GB though and it's my understanding now having read more about it that I could easily had used 50 GB of that as SSD cache instead and the other 200 GB as storage and basically got the same thing at no extra cost or limitations whatsoever, with stuff I already had. I of course boot from the SSD now as is. So for Intel SRT to work I would have to install Windows on the HDD, at-least when setting it up. I do have an AMD motherboard and processor running right now though and they don't support that and hence I haven't used it for the current machine anyway.

How Optane cache stick is now:

I've got three problems with Optane though:


1) Price and that an SSD could be used for the same.

2) Almost all consumer boards (Z370) only come with 6 SATA slots of which 4 will be removed if you use 2 M.2 drives (Optane + NVMe one, you could question why you'd use both) resulting in just 2 SATA connections left which in my case would be my current EVO 850 drive and my HDD. No connectivity for another HDD for backup purposes, no possibility to connect an optical drive (by SATA), another HDD.. whatever. ASRock Z370 Extreme4 is one proud exception with 8 SATA connections, additional front USB type C connection I think, thunderbolt header, better VRM (at-least by the looks of it, not necessarily performance), an additional M.2 key E slot for WiFi purposes. At a low price. Being smart and going with X299 (or the competitive product) would had solved this. Originally I wanted to get X99 and i7 5820K before the SEK tanked.

And 3) It's claimed it only work with the boot-drive!

What just boot-drive means:

# 3 would mean I'll have to have Windows on a HDD and my current one is a silent and still running WD Green 3 TB 5900 RPM but it's not won't be the best performer. I've checked the various options for drives WD Black, Gold and HGST HE10 drives all have a seek noise level of 36 bels whereas this one is 28 or 29. Gold and HE10 are supposed to be solid drives as far as reliability goes and it's what I would prefer there but I also don't want a noisy PC. Especially if it's a Windows boot drive and as such used more or less the whole time and hence constantly making noise! The Seagate Ironwolf for instance is a less noisy NAS drive and it's also cheaper, but it's supposed to be less reliable and have a shorter warranty and since my backup procedures are ... non-existent.. and I don't know how to do that reliably (if I sync data I may copy infected data or data with the mistakes I've made, I assume Windows do no automatic check-sums on files like ZFS does so I also have no idea even if my files are corrupt and in the case of viruses or ransom-ware I assume it would be the best to not hook the drive up by SATA.

If it could just had cached whichever drive(s) I picked I wouldn't had much trouble with it. It would just turn any HDD into an SSHD but an even better one and could move between HDDs. Obviously I still could had done it with my SSD but at-least as is officially that would had required me to have Windows on the HDD so let's pretend I still thought Optane was a good idea because of that if nothing else.

The work-around / hack I've read about:

For the SSD-cache but I assume Optane SRT work no different (except I've read that a faulty SSD doesn't break down your data since it's all on the HDD whereas a faulty Optane give you trouble because some content only remain on that device? Just OS files or may some other files ONLY be on the Optane and as such lost? Just recently written stuff until they have been written to the HDD a bit later? Is this a large problem? I know Anandtech´s Optane-drive died but the TBW-value suggest it shouldn't be the norm) I've read made it the way he wanted with SSD as boot drive _AND_ HDD-cache by first installing Windows onto his hard-drive, then running the Intel SRT software and allocate part of his SSD as cache for that HDD, and start using it as that, then install Windows onto the rest of his SSD and I assume install the Intel SRT software there too so BIOS and Windows was fine using it, and then in his case wiping out the content of the Windows partition on the HDD. The whole purpose of that thread was then to suggest that the caching would still be running but he would be booting from the SSD!

So for my setup that would be:


1) Install Windows on HDD.


2) Install Intel Optane software and start using the Optane drive as cache for the HDD (do one assign a whole drive or a partition?)

3) Install Windows onto my SSD (and install the Intel Optane software I suppose.)


4) Set my SSD as boot device and boot that instead.

And then hopefully run Windows from SSD but still have Optane caching on the HDD!

Optional maybe possible step:


5) Remove Windows files from the HDD since I'm no longer booting that.

Would this work?

There's of course always the possibility to try and figure out.

If this work then I assume any Windows files which was put onto the Optane drive for caching purposes may be unused and not of any advantage and Windows performance just rely on the SSD performance.


I wonder if the Optane drive and caching solution would still be up and running and whatever it would keep caching stuff on the HDD once ran though.

(I assume Intel have absolutely no interest in sponsoring and attempt of it with if it works a video/post explaining how too for those willing to give it a go. As is I'm very unsure whatever the Optane-cache is anything for me and it seem like it has just brought me a lot of troubles I didn't had as far as HDDs go (in a NAS I'd be fine with a noisier or slower HDD and keep reliance but not in my desktop PC as boot-drive!) I don't know if even this solution would be anything for me. Easiest and just as it's expected to be used would be to use HDD and Optane and install Windows and set the software up and then if you happened to have an SSD then sure by all means install some software onto that too or put your small files or tiny pictures which Windows enjoy trying to create new thumbnails from at each listening onto it to avoid the horrible HDD performance for some other usage scenarios.)

I assume maybe you can't answer if this would work because you don't know and it's not the supported / official solution. Also maybe you lack the technical know-how or an interest in speaking about it to tell how it would work in this case. I could see how it could work since it seem the special RAID-setup so to say is saved in / setup through BIOS / EFI / early hardware boot and if the Intel SRT software need to be installed for it to work then having that on the SSD would had provided that too.

Also Linux:

I have 8-10 hard-drives of EXT, Maybe ReiserFS/XFS or whatever it was called, BSD UFS, Solaris UFS, Solaris ZFS, HFS(X?)+, NTFS/FAT32 (but Windows have no problem with that ..), Amiga FFS content. Linux likely could run most of that but Windows can't at-least not stock. Am I understanding things correctly in that running Optane + HDD using Intel SRT would create a device Linux can't handle and as such that would make it impossible for me to backup and gather all that data onto a new say 8 TB drive used for this? If so I'll repeat the question as for whatever Optane is used with a whole HDD or with a partition. Could I partition the HDD and then have one part which is only accessible by Windows and another I could use for Linux and to gather up all my data on? I could gather up all that data on my current 3 TB drive but if I could have it on a new 4-8 TB drive that would mean I could use my cu...

0 Kudos
3 Replies

Hello aliquis,



Thank you very much for the detailed suggestion.



The Intel® Optane™ Memory has only been validated to be used on SATA boot drives with Windows* 10, but we will bring this information to our business unit for consideration.



To answer your question, if a drive contains a boot (Windows* 10) and a data partition, the entire disk will be accelerated. As per your inquiry on dual boot, we cannot guarantee and do not support a configuration where one drive contains more than one operating system partition.



Please let us know if there's anything else we can help you with.



Best regards,


Eugenio F.
0 Kudos



The idea wasn't to have multiple Windows partitions on the same drive.

The idea was to:

1) Install Windows onto HDD.


2) Set up Optane as cache for HDD thereby linking them together and make them work together.


3) Install Windows onto an SSD and install the Intel software there.


4) Boot from SSD. Hopefully Optane drive and HDD would still be linked.


(5) Remove Windows files from the HDD.)

As a way to force the Optane to be used with a secondary drive rather than the boot drive since the system would then boot from SSD instead.

I hate that I ordered the drive due to all these issues it run me into. If I return it I will be forced to return the i7 8700K too because I ordered them together to get a discount and they unlikely will offer that if I return one of the items.

Then again rumor has it 9th gen chips will get AVX 512 and 8 cores at the i7 and 6 at the i5. I don't know if they will be the 10 nm chips or whatever that's still off. Maybe not if you rush them out? Before it was planned for H2 but with the current rush out and motherboard partners leaking information and software getting id numbers for chips one got to wonder if Z390 and 9th gen are closer and if so how close. Q1 seem very early.

I wanted to go i7 to make sure I wouldn't feel Ryzen was better at something, kinda, and for (software encoded) streaming and such which i7 7700K did poorly so something with more cores was better. But games run well even on the i3 8100 and if you're upgrading soon with even more shiny stuff then really i3 8100 right now and upgrade later would be an alternative too. Just too bad on only having Z370 motherboards out though. That will change soon enough but my AMD Phenom X4 9850 is complete garbage so ..

I should had kept the processor ordered in March .. Or ordered the i7 5820K and X99 back in 2015(4?). The 6 SATA slots with 4 dropped my M.2 drives feel so limiting, of course DMI 3.0 interface is too and everything. I guess it's the price of ~no development for 5+ years or whatever.

The problem is of course that the capability to release better stuff has been around for long. It just haven't been released to main-stream consumers because they had no alternative and hence it wasn't needed. But you guys of course already have the more cores, more memory channels, more PCI-express lanes, more everything available for the server market so it exist. So releasing it is easy enough.

So hard for someone like me who have wanted to upgrade for at-least 2(3?) years and absolutely need it. I could had bought a used system too of course. It's hard. HEDT platform always seem better, those who have the old one can get very high core count Xeon processors for spare-change now. But I think you used different sockets on server chips and HEDT chips now? Anyway that's very off-topic. Hard to show confidence into what to buy in the volatile market. Z370 has kinda been marketed as a dead platform from the beginning with Z390 being "the real" thing. It's a terrible time with the high RAM, SSD and GPU prices and outdated Pascal generation too but still since my current PC is so poor :/

0 Kudos

Hello aliquis,



Thanks for clarifying the proposed workaround process. We'll inform our business unit .



Best regards,


Eugenio F.



0 Kudos