- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is Intel aware of or currently involved in any effort to validate or certify SGX according to formal specifications such as FIPS 140 or Common Criteria? We are faced with customers who would value such validation, and we are wondering if anything can be said along those lines.
- Tags:
- General Support
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Roar,
FIPS and the like don’t certify instructions or Trusted Execution Environments like SGX provides. They certify crypto algorithms and functions at the lower levels and even hardware components (chassis intrusion detection, environmental conditions or fluctuations, even protections against radiation/EMP) at the upper levels. Some orgs have used SGX and gotten FIPS 140-2 certifications, e.g. WolfSSL and Fortanix, using SGX, but you can’t actually get a FIPS certification for SGX itself. This Wiki has a good description.
Regards,
Jesus
Intel Customer Support
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page