Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Intel Community
- Software
- Software Development SDKs and Libraries
- Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
- Low Accuracy on dgeevx results, how to increase accuracy?

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

utab

Beginner

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

08-01-2014
08:18 AM

53 Views

Low Accuracy on dgeevx results, how to increase accuracy?

Dear all,

I am trying to solve a non-symmetric tridiagonal eigenvalue problem with dgeevx from MKL, however the accuracy of the eigenvalues are not that good. I am also using dsyevr for symmetric tridiagonal matrices and for that routine there is a tolerance setting. I was wondering if there is a way to increase the accuracy of dgeevx. At the moment, I am solving without balancing and scaling.

Best regards,

Umut

Link Copied

2 Replies

mecej4

Black Belt

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

08-01-2014
09:11 AM

53 Views

On what basis do you conclude that DGEEVX is of low accuracy? Is this experienced with any tridiagonal matrix, or can you give a specific example? What is the size of the matrix?

Have you considered using specialized software, e.g., see the link to Dario Bini's Eigensolve at the end of the page http://fibonacci.dm.unipi.it/~bini/Ricerca/ric.html ?

utab

Beginner

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

08-01-2014
09:35 AM

53 Views

mecej4 wrote:

On what basis do you conclude that DGEEVX is of low accuracy? Is this experienced with any tridiagonal matrix, or can you give a specific example? What is the size of the matrix?

Have you considered using specialized software, e.g., see the link to Dario Bini's Eigensolve at the end of the page http://fibonacci.dm.unipi.it/~bini/Ricerca/ric.html ?

I am comparing the results with the results of MATLAB, eig , for accuracy.

These are the reduced problems of a Lanczos solver and sizes range from 40-50 to a value around 500(if the block sizes are large )

Yes I can give an example, but need more time, I will soon send a matrix where the accuracy seems to be low.

Thx.

Umut

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.