- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am evaluating the MKL for creating a signal processing library. My specific needs are to make use of the 1/2/3-d dft functions. Testing the 1d real dft function gives expected results. Testing the 2d real dft vs. the 2d complex dft yields different answers (ignoring the complex conjugate symmetry). The 3x3 matrix is a linear, contiguous array, so the strides are 0,N,1. Other than memory allocation, and loading real vs. complex data, the real and complex code is identical. Is there a bug here, or am I missing something? I can display code if necessary.
Thanks,
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I forgot to mention an important detail. The 2d complex fft yields expected results, the 2d real does not.
thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Why not provide the data and we will look at the problem.
Bruce

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page