- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I can't seem to find a way to instantiate a multiplier that will dynamically select between signed and unsigned multiplication. This is on a Cyclone II, but applies to other parts as well.
Reading the Cyclone II documentation it is clear that signa, signb inputs does what I want, but none of the multipliers created with the Wizzard exports that as an input signal. Trying to infer it with the code below doesn't work (bug in Quartus II?); it complains that no logic depends on input_sign. However looking at the RTL with Tools/Netlist Viewers/RTL Viewer clearly shows it being used, however the technology map viewer shows input_sign as disconnected and signa and signb hardwired to ground. This looks like a bug to me, but I could be doing something wrong.
module mult(input clock,
input input_sign,
input input_a,
input input_b,
output reg output_c);
reg a, b;
reg sign;
always @(posedge clock) begin
sign <= input_sign;
a <= input_a;
b <= input_b;
if (sign)
output_c <= $signed(a) * $signed(b);
else
output_c <= $unsigned(a) * $unsigned(b);
end
endmodule
Link Copied
- « Previous
- Next »
42 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- It is always true if we allow for correct width. The issue of 8 bit width representing numbers from 0~127 and -1 to -128 is separate. The puzzle still stands: - => + should reverse + => - naturally hence for - => + subtract 1 then invert (by definition) but how come the same rule apply to both conversions as well. i.e. [invert add 1] in either case. --- Quote End --- If you search Wikipedia for "two's complement" there is an explanation, but rather complex. For me, when you start with a positive number and complement the objective is to find the distance from zero in the negative direction so when you complement 0 "adding 1" has the effect of reducing the magnitude so that 0 is still zero, but the magnitude of all negative numbers appears to be offset toward 0. When you complement the negative number you have to add 1 to adjust the magnitude to get the correct distance from 0 in the positive direction. Therefore the maximum negative number 1.000 ... 0 is farther away from 0 than the maximum positive number and cannot be converted.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
- Next »