- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Having installed Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0 and then Visual FORTRAN 6.1 for a mixed language project, my FORTRAN will not compile.
(1) /TRACEBACK and /WARN:NOFILEOPT are default compiler options that are not recognized
(2) Eliminating them, on my USE NUMERICAL_LIBRARIES statement for using IMSL, the compiler complains that a newer F90 compiler is required.
Am I somehow not getting access to the Compaq compiler?
Is the installation messed up because I installed on my second (D:) disk instead of on my system (C:) disk?
Any suggestions?
Sheldon Applegate
(1) /TRACEBACK and /WARN:NOFILEOPT are default compiler options that are not recognized
(2) Eliminating them, on my USE NUMERICAL_LIBRARIES statement for using IMSL, the compiler complains that a newer F90 compiler is required.
Am I somehow not getting access to the Compaq compiler?
Is the installation messed up because I installed on my second (D:) disk instead of on my system (C:) disk?
Any suggestions?
Sheldon Applegate
Lien copié
1 Répondre
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
There should not be a problem installing Visual Fortran to disk D: - mine's installed to disk F:. But Visual Fortran and MS Visual Studio should be installed to the same disk.
It sounds to me as if you have two different versions of Visual Fortran installed, perhaps an older V5, and are getting this version. Are you building from a command line? If so, check that AUTOEXEC.BAT (if Windows 9X) or your system-wide environment variables (NT/2000) reference the CVF V6.1 paths and not DVF V5.
Steve
It sounds to me as if you have two different versions of Visual Fortran installed, perhaps an older V5, and are getting this version. Are you building from a command line? If so, check that AUTOEXEC.BAT (if Windows 9X) or your system-wide environment variables (NT/2000) reference the CVF V6.1 paths and not DVF V5.
Steve
Répondre
Options du sujet
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Marquer le sujet comme nouveau
- Marquer le sujet comme lu
- Placer ce Sujet en tête de liste pour l'utilisateur actuel
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Page imprimable