- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Has anyone else posted messages to this forum but not have them show up at all? It has happened to me more than once, and I'm not even counting the attempts with a long message.
-John
-John
Link Copied
8 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The last postings to thread "questions about new forum" are about the problem posting long messages
Walter Kramer
Walter Kramer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, but I've had 4-line postings not appear either.
-John
-John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd appreciate details (including the text of what you tried to post) of any problems. I've posted with links here and it has worked fine.
Send me mail - steve.lionel@compaq.com
Steve
Send me mail - steve.lionel@compaq.com
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Can I take this opportunity to ask why posted messages consisting of seperated lines of text (such as sample coding answers to queries) are telescoped together into paragraphs, rendering them uninterpretable and hence unlikely to be of the intended use?
I have recieved an e-mailed copy of an intended posting that I made
which appeared exactly as I entered it. However, when it turned up on the
message board, it was telescoped as decribed. This shortcoming must surely be rectified by Compaq, or else clear guidance given on how to post text to prevent this happening.
I have recieved an e-mailed copy of an intended posting that I made
which appeared exactly as I entered it. However, when it turned up on the
message board, it was telescoped as decribed. This shortcoming must surely be rectified by Compaq, or else clear guidance given on how to post text to prevent this happening.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Tony,
The good thing about the CVF forum is that it supports HTML tags in
messages. The bad thing about the CVF forum is that it supports HTML tags in messages badly, i.e. it parses the posted message text so that
it screws line breaks.
So far, I have found the following tricks working fine:
Italic text using Italic
Underline text using Underline
In all above examples, replace [] with <> to have it work.
John has serious problems trying to include links in the messages :-(.
Fortunately, I did not try it so far.
HTH
Jugoslav
The good thing about the CVF forum is that it supports HTML tags in
messages. The bad thing about the CVF forum is that it supports HTML tags in messages badly, i.e. it parses the posted message text so that
it screws line breaks.
So far, I have found the following tricks working fine:
Italic text using Italic
Underline text using Underline
Separate paragraph
text usingSeparate paragraph
Codeshould be posted using
Code
In all above examples, replace [] with <> to have it work.
John has serious problems trying to include links in the messages :-(.
Fortunately, I did not try it so far.
HTH
Jugoslav
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'll pass on the complaint about the inappropriate removal of "newlines". I found that you can use the tags to bracket text to leave as-is, or add
tags after each line. A nuisance, I know.
Steve
tags after each line. A nuisance, I know.
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Steve,
Any fix coming for the removal of "newlines" problem?
How 'bout any "news" :-) on NNTP access?
Thanks,
JT
Any fix coming for the removal of "newlines" problem?
How 'bout any "news" :-) on NNTP access?
Thanks,
JT
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
My browser (IE5 on Win98) shows all the menu entries for this thread shoved off to the far right-hand side of the screen in a narrow column. The entries for the next two threads appear as below, and I can't select them.
This looks very strange.
Mike Durisin
foo1(stuff); pITest->foo2(6, stuff); But even when the CS Wizard has the interface properties set for non-oleautomation compatible data types, it seems that the CS wizard still generates code for a SAFEARRAY*. In which case you must edit some of the DO NOT EDIT files (IDL at least) if you absolutely want to use this approach. Maybe Leo can comment here on CS Wizard support for arrays in the absence of the oleautomation attribute. If it were me, I'd stick to using the oleautomation attribute ("Uses only Automation data types"). The upside is support for VB clients, SafeArrays have a much better language mapping to f90 (particularly for multidimensional arrays), and the ease of type lib marshalling. hth, John" href="/forum?14@@.ee90465!SearchMark=1#1">Hi Ralph, Case 1: Your object's interface is marked dual or olea ...
This looks very strange.
Mike Durisin

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page