- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi folks
When attempting to write a short offload section I get the run time error
address range partially overlaps with existing allocation
but not sure where to start debugging this. Here's the code section in question (sorry it seems to have lost indenting):
#pragma omp parallel for default(none), private(i,k,term3,m,sum_Theta_Psi,n), shared(Theta_i, Psi, ln_Gamma_i, Q, molecules, maxGroupNum)
for (i=0; i<molecules; i++) {
for (k=0; k<maxGroupNum; k++) {
term3 = 0.0;
for (m=0; m<maxGroupNum; m++) {
sum_Theta_Psi = 0.0; // reuse var but not for 'i' component
#pragma vector always
for (n=0; n<maxGroupNum; n++) {
sum_Theta_Psi += Theta_i
}
term3 += Theta_i
}
// reset use of sum_Theta_Psi to be used for second term
sum_Theta_Psi = 0.0;
#pragma vector always
for (m=0; m<maxGroupNum; m++) {
sum_Theta_Psi += Theta_i
}
ln_Gamma_i
}
} //for i
// omp parallel for
} // pragma offload
YOurs, mIchael
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have encountered this error when I tried to create coprocessor side arrays without the correspoding host arrays. However, it is difficult to tell what exactly is going wrong in your code. Could you share a little more of your code that includes the offload pragma and the declarations/allocations of the data passed to the offload.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Sumedh and co... I can't really share the full code since it is one a colleague is working on for publication (sorry) but here's the offload pragma:
#pragma offload target(mic) in(Theta_i:length(molecules*maxGroupNum)) in(Psi:length(maxGroupNum*maxGroupNum)) in(Q:length(maxGroupNum)) in(molecules, maxGroupNum) inout(ln_Gamma_i:length(molecules*maxGroupNum))
with the arrays passed as float*/int* and float**
HTH, M
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Do the actual allocations on the host match those specified in the offload?
Jim Dempsey
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Michael,
Sorry for this super late reply. I looked through your reproducer and noticed that you are trying to transfer data of type float** to the coprocessor. The offload pragma does not support complex data types with pointers and non-contiguous blocks of data. You could either modify your code to fulfill this requirement or could use the virtual shared memory model. Please note that although the shared memory provides easy portability, the overhead and synchronization required in this method leads to a sub-optimal performance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Michael,
Sumedh is correct. You will want something like:
[cpp]
float* Adata = &A[0][0];
float* Bdata = &B[0][0];
float* Cdata = &C[0][0];
#pragma offload target(mic) \
in (Adata:length(size1*size2)) \
in(Bdata:length(size2*size2)) \
out(Cdata:length(size1*size2))
{
float **A, **B, **C; // rows x cols
A = alloc_2d_float_offload(Adata, size1, size2); //create array of pointers without allocating data
B = alloc_2d_float_offload(Bdata, size2, size2); // this function inside MIC
C = alloc_2d_float_offload(Cdata, size1, size2);
...
free(A); // but not Adata
free(B); // but not Bdata
free(C); // but not Cdata
[/cpp]
Jim Dempsey
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page