- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have just recently upgraded to Intel C++ Studio for windows, and downloaded the file for 64/32 bit.
During installation, my Anti Vir virus scan detected several malwares.
One of them was "HTML/Malicious.ActiveX.Gen". What can I do now. I don't want to use
the system with this trojan(s).
Have you already some experiences with viruses? Or is there another place to download?
Link Copied
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
24 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Good to know that vtss.sys is not really necessary.
Fine, Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hallo Hubert,
just to give some further information about this matter, e.g. for every user
trying to circumvent this problem by using the 64-bit-only version of Intel C++ Studio.
I've just tried to install the Intel C++ Studio only-64-bit-version on another machine. Unfortunately,
the same problem arises. First, I was rather astonished. But then, the reason appeared to be simple: The VTune in the 64-bit-Intel C++ studio has also a 32 bit version, becauseit is the same VTune package, and VTune doesn't seem to be divided into a 32-bit- and 64-bit-only version.
Of course, inactivating that 32-bit vtss.sys also solves this problem. But it's not worth installing the 64-bit-only version of the whole studio.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thomas,
Thanks for the hint!
Hubert.
Thanks for the hint!
Hubert.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Thomas,
I hope I can bring some new insights in this issue. This is definitely a false positive from Avira. I checked the file with a tool against the 42 most used antivirus engines and only Antivira reported an issue with this file.
The issue reported by Antivira itself is a generic one (they are often marked by .Gen, like in this case). That means Antivira detected a pattern inside the file which looks similar to patterns which can also be used as part of a virus. Virus scanners try often to detect also unknown viruses with these kinds of heuristics. In this case this gives a false positive.
If you have any further questions, be will be glad to answer them for you.
Alex
Intel Developer Support
I hope I can bring some new insights in this issue. This is definitely a false positive from Avira. I checked the file with a tool against the 42 most used antivirus engines and only Antivira reported an issue with this file.
The issue reported by Antivira itself is a generic one (they are often marked by .Gen, like in this case). That means Antivira detected a pattern inside the file which looks similar to patterns which can also be used as part of a virus. Virus scanners try often to detect also unknown viruses with these kinds of heuristics. In this case this gives a false positive.
If you have any further questions, be will be glad to answer them for you.
Alex
Intel Developer Support

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »