My system has got two sockets with Sandy Bridge Processors. Total RAM is 64 GB and has got NUMA enabled.
I am studying two PCI Registers namely, DRAM Rule Register ( for determining interleaving at socket level); and a TAD Register.
for understanding the address mapping scheme in MC.
My question is although there is no interleaving across sockets/numa nodes i.e each NUMA node
has got 32GB( contiguous with no interleaving as per the DRAM Rule Registers). But still each numa node
has got two TAD entries. Documents say that TAD entries correspond to SAD interleaving schemes. Can anyone
help me explain the existence of such TAD entries in this case even though there''s no SAD interleaving. Is it possible ?
Which manual (and section) are you referencing? A URL would be helpful. This saves everyone time having to find the info you are referencing.
Please see section 126.96.36.199 for detaills regarding DRAM RULE and Section 188.8.131.52 for TAD Register Description in the below document
And an explanation about the TAD Register is given in the following document and Section No 6.2.1
Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 Series Datasheet, Volume 2
Thanks. Are thse questions to solve a problem? If so, can you tell us the problem? Or are they just curiosity or a school project? This will help us prioritize the questions versus work we are expected to be doing.
Its a university research project targetted at achieving considerable power savings on intel based servers based on introducing architecture specific memory management techniques in the linux kernel.
For this it is essential to unravell the memory addressing scheme based on documented information available.
Currently all readings of all required registers related to the MC are done (A few values I have posted in my previous post ).
Now I am trying to make a sense of the values of those registers. For which I require help of the community.
I have attached a text file tabulating a few of those register values for reference.