Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
YKiku
Beginner
521 Views

Questions about HW on I210 Ethernet Controller .

When "I210 Ethernet Controller" is not used, is the pin no problem with "1-4"?

 

  1. PECLKP /N    :25pin,26pin ⇒NC
  2. PE_RP /N      :23pin,24pin ⇒NC
  3. PE_TP /N      :21pin,20pin ⇒NC
  4. PE_RST_N    : 17pin ⇒PD 10kΩ
0 Kudos
7 Replies
Adolfo_S_Intel
Moderator
119 Views

Hello @YKiku​  I am investigating your case, I will provide more information as soon as possible.

 

Best Regards,

Adolfo Sanchez

Adolfo_S_Intel
Moderator
119 Views

Hello @YKiku​ 

 

The engineers state that no PCIE pins can left unconnected, they also want to clarify what do you mean by "I210 Ethernet Controller is not used", what feature is not being used?

 

Best Regards,

Adolfo Sanchez

YKiku
Beginner
119 Views

​Thank you for reply.

I want to make 1port of 2port HW Ready.

I asked this time because I want to mount the IC and make it usable by remodeling.

 

If so, are there any problems with pins 1-4?

  1. PECLKP /N    :25pin,26pin ⇒PD 10kΩ
  2. PE_RP /N      :23pin,24pin ⇒PD 10kΩ
  3. PE_TP /N      :21pin,20pin ⇒NC
  4. PE_RST_N    : 17pin ⇒PD 10kΩ

 

CarlosAM_INTEL
Moderator
119 Views

Hello, @YKiku​:

 

Thanks for your clarification.

 

It is important to let you know that the mentioned configuration is invalidated because all PCI lines must be attached.

 

Best regards,

@Mæcenas_INTEL​.

YKiku
Beginner
119 Views

Hello , Intel Team,

​Thank you for reply.

I understand that PCIe requires all connections.

 

Please tell me last.

Stay in the RESET state,

does termination of the PCIe lane cause the IC to break in the short circuit?

 

Or there is no short circuit failure,

Not recommended because PCIe not connected is not assumed?

CarlosAM_INTEL
Moderator
119 Views

Hello, @YKiku​:

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

All PCI lines must be attached for the part to work properly.

 

Best regards,

@Mæcenas_INTEL​.

YKiku
Beginner
119 Views

Thanks for your reply.

I understand.

Reply