Embedded Intel® Core™ Processors
Communicate Intel® Core™ Hardware, Software, Firmware, Graphics Concerns
1271 Discussions

c2758 clk errata fixed in latest chips? Also what are the soc emulation options for software development before actual custom board comes?

TChal
Beginner
1,484 Views

Hi,

1. we are planning to build a custom board with ATOM c2758. saw an issue circulating in the net about clk. does it fixed in latest chips?

2. If we want to develop firmware before Board comes what are our options? is there a soc simulator/emulator available.

3. does intel releases FSP for c2758?

Thanks in advance for your help,

Tiru

0 Kudos
1 Reply
CarlosAM_INTEL
Moderator
665 Views

Hello, tiru:

Thank you for contacting Intel Embedded Community.

It is unclear what is the clk issue that you are referring. The known issues related to this subject are listed in a detailed way in the errata AVR1, AVR50, and AVR54; on pages 18, 34, and 35 of the https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/atom-c2000-family-spec-update.pdf Intel(R) Atom(TM) Processor C2000 Product Family Specification Update document # 329460, also on pages 9 and 10 of this document you may find the steppings affected by these problems.

The Intel(R) Firmware Support Package POSTGOLD4 is the suggested for Intel(R) Atom(TM) Processor C2000 Product Family. You can confirm this information in the https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/release-notes/atom-c2000-fsp-g4-release-notes.pdf Intel(R) Firmware Support Package for Intel(R) Atom(TM) Processor C2000 Product Family for Communications Infrastructure POSTGOLD4 Release Notes document # 333408.

On the other hand, in order to help you with your firmware development process, please refer to the tools listed at the following website:

https://designintools.intel.com/where-are-you-in-the-process-a/274.htm https://designintools.intel.com/where-are-you-in-the-process-a/274.htm

We hope that this information may help you.

Best regards,

Carlos_A.

0 Kudos
Reply