- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
I'm using the UG-ALTCHIPID IP (ID 683336) for creating unique chip id to identify the device. I'm using it on Cyclone V device but plan to use other supported devices.
I wonder if the unique chip id will be the same every time even after a long period of time (20 years).
Does the technology of the unique chip id based on some PUF technology (which varies over time) or an unstable internal memory device?
Does it depends on the Operating Temperture(Commercial, Industrial or Automotive) of the device?
Thank you very much
I wonder if the unique chip id will be the same every time even after a long period of time (20 years).
Does the technology of the unique chip id based on some PUF technology (which varies over time) or an unstable internal memory device?
Does it depends on the Operating Temperture(Commercial, Industrial or Automotive) of the device?
Thank you very much
1 Solution
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi,
Please see below for my answer:
- Unique chip ID will be the same even after a long period.
- No, the unique chip ID is not based on PUF technology. The chip ID information is embedded into silicon.
- No, unique chip ID does not depends on operation temperature. If you get different chipID, it might be due to the JTAG TDO signal is not clean, thus the interpretation of the binary number of the chipID is different.
Regards,
Aiman
Lien copié
4 Réponses
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi,
Please see below for my answer:
- Unique chip ID will be the same even after a long period.
- No, the unique chip ID is not based on PUF technology. The chip ID information is embedded into silicon.
- No, unique chip ID does not depends on operation temperature. If you get different chipID, it might be due to the JTAG TDO signal is not clean, thus the interpretation of the binary number of the chipID is different.
Regards,
Aiman
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi,
Any further information needed for this case? Else, I will proceed to close this case for now.
Regards,
Aiman
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
I’m glad that your question has been addressed, I now transition this thread to community support. If you have a new question, feel free to open a new thread to get the support from Intel experts. Otherwise, the community users will continue to help you on this thread. Thank you.

Répondre
Options du sujet
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Marquer le sujet comme nouveau
- Marquer le sujet comme lu
- Placer ce Sujet en tête de liste pour l'utilisateur actuel
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Page imprimable