Are these Result's normal?

[GAlgu]

http://www.catzilla.com/showresult?lp=276930 http://www.catzilla.com/showresult?lp=276930

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/3222596 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/3222596

Are these results normal to my notebook?

Configs:

Intel Core i5-3210M Processor

Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile

4GB of ram

HD Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500gb

Windows 8.1 64 bits

[Jose_H_Intel1]

I am unable to comment on the benchmarks results because we do not validate them but you can run the Intel® Processor Diagnostic Tool if you want to know if your processor is working properly.

http://www.intel.com/support/processors/sb/CS-031726.htm Processors — What is the Intel® Processor Diagnostic Tool?

[GAlgu]

But is that normal my notebook don't run BF3 even on low graphics and resolution HD?

[Jose_H_Intel1]

The following article is related to your issue: http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/CS-033409.htm Graphics — Battlefield 3* game issues resolved with patch

[GAlgu]

im already using the last version of the game.looks like that my pc cant run this game

[Jose_H_Intel1]

I am sorry; the following article lists the games we have tested with Intel® HD Graphics 4000: http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/CS-033387.htm Graphics — Sample of popular games playable with Intel® HD Graphics 4000/2500

[GAlgu]

The problem its problably the fact that the HD graphics 4000 is worse than a videocard of 2008 (4 years older than its): http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=864&gid2=28&compare=intel-hd-graphics-4000-mobile-vs-geforce-9600-gt-512mb HD Graphics 4000 Mobile compare Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 512MB GPU

How can be it possible?

[Jose_H_Intel1]

I apologize; we do not make comparisons with third party graphics adapters.