- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I recently bought a Asus Zenbook UX303UB with a skylake 520 and a dedicated NVIDIA 940M GPUs.
If I run Cinebench R15 I get a fps at 40.59 with the 520 and 33.88 fps with the NVIDIA 940M.
In 3DMARK Cloud Gate I get 37.70 fps with the 520 and 31.83 fps with the NVIDIA 940M.
As far as I can see the 520 runs OpenGL 4.4 and the 940M runs OpenGL 4.5.
The IntelHD out performs the NVIDIA card in OpenGL applications but not in DirectX applications like CS:GO (CounterStrike: Global Offensive) for example.
How come?
I attached images of the benchmarks, sorry for the quality.
- Tags:
- Benchmarks
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, ikonane:
The performance of your device would depend on the whole system configuration, how it was designed and integrated in this case since it is a laptop.
Benchmarks provide with a performance "score" for the devices, since they are third party software, the support is limited.
Regards,
Esteban C
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for the answer.
So another way to put it is that the 520 "better" at OpenGL (at least in these benchmarks) even though the nvidia uses a later version?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, ikonane:
The scores would depend on different factors, the software used, how the OEM integrated and set the device, temperatures, drivers, because of that , I would say the performance could be affected between the GPU and CPU.
You could also look for similar systems and benchmarking scores to have a better overview of this.
Regards,
Esteban C
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page