- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
I recently bought a Asus Zenbook UX303UB with a skylake 520 and a dedicated NVIDIA 940M GPUs.
If I run Cinebench R15 I get a fps at 40.59 with the 520 and 33.88 fps with the NVIDIA 940M.
In 3DMARK Cloud Gate I get 37.70 fps with the 520 and 31.83 fps with the NVIDIA 940M.
As far as I can see the 520 runs OpenGL 4.4 and the 940M runs OpenGL 4.5.
The IntelHD out performs the NVIDIA card in OpenGL applications but not in DirectX applications like CS:GO (CounterStrike: Global Offensive) for example.
How come?
I attached images of the benchmarks, sorry for the quality.
- 태그:
- Benchmarks
링크가 복사됨
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Hello, ikonane:
The performance of your device would depend on the whole system configuration, how it was designed and integrated in this case since it is a laptop.
Benchmarks provide with a performance "score" for the devices, since they are third party software, the support is limited.
Regards,
Esteban C
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Thanks for the answer.
So another way to put it is that the 520 "better" at OpenGL (at least in these benchmarks) even though the nvidia uses a later version?
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Hello, ikonane:
The scores would depend on different factors, the software used, how the OEM integrated and set the device, temperatures, drivers, because of that , I would say the performance could be affected between the GPU and CPU.
You could also look for similar systems and benchmarking scores to have a better overview of this.
Regards,
Esteban C
