- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I have trained yolov2 darknet model on custom dataset with 2 classes. I want to convert that into OpenVino.
So I am following this link -
First I am trying to convert into tensorflow using this command
python3 ./flow --model <path_to_model>/<model_name>.cfg --load <path_to_model>/<model_name>.weights --savepb
But I am getting this error -
Parsing yolov2.cfg
Loading yolov2.weights ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./flow", line 6, in <module>
cliHandler(sys.argv)
File "darkflow/darkflow/cli.py", line 26, in cliHandler
tfnet = TFNet(FLAGS)
File "darkflow/darkflow/net/build.py", line 58, in __init__
darknet = Darknet(FLAGS)
File "darkflow/darkflow/dark/darknet.py", line 27, in __init__
self.load_weights()
File "darkflow/darkflow/dark/darknet.py", line 82, in load_weights
wgts_loader = loader.create_loader(*args)
File "darkflow/darkflow/utils/loader.py", line 105, in create_loader
return load_type(path, cfg)
File "darkflow/darkflow/utils/loader.py", line 19, in __init__
self.load(*args)
File "darkflow/darkflow/utils/loader.py", line 77, in load
walker.offset, walker.size)
AssertionError: expect 202335260 bytes, found 202335264
Any help will be appreciated
Regards
Ashish
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dearest verma, Ashish,
Are you using the latest OpenVino Release 2019R1.1 ? Also I'm curious. Why do you want to use yolo2 when yolo3 is clearly improved (better, faster) ? yolo2 should really only be used for backward compatibility purposes but any new development should use yolo3.
Thanks,
Shubha
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Shubha,
I am just testing different yolo version for a requirement with less number of classes. I am already able to run yolov3-openvino version but It's taking more time then expected, so I am just curious to know how yolov2 performs with the same number of classes.
Although I am able to convert original yolov2 model to OpenVino but not my custom trained model, I just reduced the number of classes and change the filters in yolov2.cfg file.
I am using 2018 R5.1 version and I have also read somewhere that yolov3 is accurate but not faster due to more number of layers.
I have one more doubt currently for Yolov3 I am able to convert in OpenVino with input size = 416 , Can I do the same with input size = 320.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ashish
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear verma, Ashish,
Wow 2018 R5.1 is ancient. We are on 2019R1.1 right now so I strongly recommend that you upgrade. Tiny YoloV3 is supposed to be a lightweight version of YoloV3 (far fewer layers), but unfortunately Tiny YoloV3 is broken on OpenVino 2019R1.1, see github issue 151 . Non-Tiny YoloV3 definitely works though.
Unfortunately we don't have any YoloV2 samples but we do have both Python and C++ versions of yoloV3 samples.
According to this darknet issue it is possible to use other input sizes besides 416.
Though we don't have a yoloV2 sample, yolov2 is definitely supported.
What you are trying to do definitely is supported by OpenVino. I encourage you to upgrade to OpenVino 2019R1.1 and try again. Please report your results here,
Much thanks,
Shubha
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Shubha,
I don't think OpenVino version is an issue because I am not able to convert the darknet model to tensorflow, using the mentioned steps, to convert it into .xml and .bin is stage 2. I will definitely upgrade my version to 2019R1.1 once I am able to get model.pb file. I need help in that.
Thanks for your quick response
Regards
Ashish
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear verma, Ashish,
Many fixes and improvements are always put into our new releases. But I see what you mean,
python3 ./flow --model <path_to_model>/<model_name>.cfg --load <path_to_model>/<model_name>.weights --savepb
Has absolutely nothing to do with OpenVino.
But I found some hits on the web regarding your issue (it's not an OpenVino issue):
https://github.com/thtrieu/darkflow/issues/223
https://github.com/thtrieu/darkflow/issues/802
Hope it helps,
Thanks,
Shubha
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Shubha,
Thanks for the links. I am able to resolve the issue, by following this -
Hey @conjuringjha , I had the same issue but I solved it by just substracting the found value (in your case 180357512) to the expected value (in your case 64701556). Let Assume the result is "X".
Now open your file ./darkflow/utils/loader.py and find the line 121. Then you will see a variable "self.offset" with a certain value assigned (16 or 20). Let suppose that value equals "Y".
Upadte the value of self.offset=Y+X
Regards
Ashish
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Ashish,
Glad it worked out for you and thanks for reporting your success back to the community !
Shubha
![](/skins/images/7FC17B7B85029576C25F1E43CE255B51/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page