Compiler update problem (10.0.027 to 10.1.014)

[jcharod]

Hi

We were using Intel Fortran 10.0.027 under Visual Studio 2005 we updated to version 10.1.014 and after that we are having the next problems:

First it was not able to open projects that was created with old version, we reinstall and now it can open the projects

Second, we are having problems to compile the projects that already exist in the old version, when I try to rebuild the projects it looks like doing something but it only sends a message that the linking was successful, but it does not show nothing about the compilation for each Fortran file. Also when I try to compile an individual Fortran file I can not select the COMPILE option from the menu by right clicking over the file

I do not know if something was incorrectly installed in Visual Studio 2005 or updated in the projects I already have from the old version?

Thank you in advance

[Steven_L_Intel1]

Are you using the Visual Studio 2005 Premier Partner Edition that was provided by 10.0? If so, the Compile menu option is not available.

When you say that it does not recompile, are you selecting Rebuild or just Build? If just Build then it will not recompile if the object files are current. It does not know that you have changed compiler versions. (Also, go to Tools > Options > Intel Fortran > Compilers and make sure that 10.1.014 is selected.)

After checking the compiler selection, do a Build > Rebuild Solution and see if you get everything rebuilt.

I have not seen an issue with not being able to open 10.0 projects.

[jcharod]

I already found the problem, it was that I have not the valid extensions for the SOURCE section in Tools > Options > Intel Fortran > General so the compiler was not recognizing as valid FOR files the ones I already had

Thank you

[Steven_L_Intel1]

Oh, do your files have some non-standard file type such as .f95?

[jcharod]

Yes, all files I am working with are .FOR and I included this extension as Fixed Format in the Intel Fortran GeneralProperties

[Steven_L_Intel1]

Now I'm really confused. .for (.FOR is the same) is recognized by default as fixed-form.