- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The Installation of the Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.039 failes on my Suse Linux 9.3. The Simple Output is:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installing...
Installation failed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have su rights and gcc already installed. Who knows whats wrong? I added the whole shell communication as a txt file.
error.txt
Regards
Darius
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installing...
Installation failed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have su rights and gcc already installed. Who knows whats wrong? I added the whole shell communication as a txt file.
error.txt
Regards
Darius
Link Copied
12 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I note from your error.txt file:
Testing Fortran compiler ...
./.././data/install_fc.sh: Cannot find ifort compiler in /opt/intel/fc/9.1.039/bin
It appears the actual installation may have completed, just the self-check failed. This could just be an issue with the ifortvars.sh/ifortvars.csh setup script.
Try sourcing the appropriate compiler setup script for working shell and ifthere is no obvious errors with that, then try compiling a simple hello program.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry. Too quick in scanning that. The installation failed further up stream; the reason is not obvious. Stand by...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apologies for the delay. Please set the environment variable LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1 and then re-run the installation. Capture the output to the screen into a file and attach it to this thread.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - Kevin Davis (Intel)
Apologies for the delay. Please set the environment variable LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1 and then re-run the installation. Capture the output to the screen into a file and attach it to this thread.
That didn't really change a anything. I atached the screen output.
Regards
Darius Friedemann
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Kevin said "set the environnment variable" e.g.
export LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1
or
setenv LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE 1
according to your shell.
You don't need to post your license key.
export LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1
or
setenv LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE 1
according to your shell.
You don't need to post your license key.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Kevin said "set the environnment variable" e.g.
export LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1
or
setenv LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE 1
according to your shell.
You don't need to post your license key.
export LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE=1
or
setenv LOCAL_INSTALL_VERBOSE 1
according to your shell.
You don't need to post your license key.
When I do so, I get exactly the same shell output as before. Any other ideas?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - darius.friedemann@tu-berlin.de
When I do so, I get exactly the same shell output as before. Any other ideas?
It appears that there is a problem installing into /opt/intel/fc/9.1.039
I'd try this:
ls -ld /opt
make sure /opt exists, is writeable, and IF /opt is a symbolic link make sure it is pointing to a valid directory that is writeable.
Can you:
touch /opt/intel/fc/9.1039/foo
Did the compiler create the directories?
ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - Ronald Green (Intel)
It appears that there is a problem installing into /opt/intel/fc/9.1.039
I'd try this:
ls -ld /opt
make sure /opt exists, is writeable, and IF /opt is a symbolic link make sure it is pointing to a valid directory that is writeable.
Can you:
touch /opt/intel/fc/9.1039/foo
Did the compiler create the directories?
ron
The folder exists and is writable. In the folder intel there is only the intel_sdp_products.db and the folder licenses. The folder intel can be touched though.
Darius
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is this an x86 or x86_64 installation of Suse?
rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ should show the 32bit compatibility libs:
compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
This was from a SLES10 system, so your version should differ. Make sure you have these libraries installed (for a 64bit system):
rpm -ql compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
And you have g++ installed, yes?
ron
rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ should show the 32bit compatibility libs:
compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
This was from a SLES10 system, so your version should differ. Make sure you have these libraries installed (for a 64bit system):
rpm -ql compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
And you have g++ installed, yes?
ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - Ronald Green (Intel)
Is this an x86 or x86_64 installation of Suse?
rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ should show the 32bit compatibility libs:
compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
This was from a SLES10 system, so your version should differ. Make sure you have these libraries installed (for a 64bit system):
rpm -ql compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
And you have g++ installed, yes?
ron
rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ should show the 32bit compatibility libs:
compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
This was from a SLES10 system, so your version should differ. Make sure you have these libraries installed (for a 64bit system):
rpm -ql compat-libstdc++-5.0.7-22.2
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
And you have g++ installed, yes?
ron
I have the 32 bit Version of the 9.3 Suse.
The output for rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ is
libstdc++-3.3.5-5.1
libstdc++42-4.2.1_20070724-17
libstdc++-devel-3.3.5-5.1
g++ is installed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - darius.friedemann@tu-berlin.de
I have the 32 bit Version of the 9.3 Suse.
The output for rpm -qa | grep libstdc++ is
libstdc++-3.3.5-5.1
libstdc++42-4.2.1_20070724-17
libstdc++-devel-3.3.5-5.1
g++ is installed.
I haven't tried installing the combined 32 and 64-bit ifort package on 32-bit SuSE. As it isn't a supported distro, the installer may not recognize that you want just the 32-bit installation in that case. A fall-back position would be to unpack the 32-bit .rpms and install those.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
If you have a working 32-bit g++ active, you should be able to install the ifort for ia32. You won't be able to install a 64-bit ifort on a 32-bit system, as the 64-bit libraries aren't present.
I haven't tried installing the combined 32 and 64-bit ifort package on 32-bit SuSE. As it isn't a supported distro, the installer may not recognize that you want just the 32-bit installation in that case. A fall-back position would be to unpack the 32-bit .rpms and install those.
I haven't tried installing the combined 32 and 64-bit ifort package on 32-bit SuSE. As it isn't a supported distro, the installer may not recognize that you want just the 32-bit installation in that case. A fall-back position would be to unpack the 32-bit .rpms and install those.
When I tried to install the rpm manually, I found out the package was damaged. After downloading again it worked. I apprechiate everybodys help.
Darius Friedemann

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page