- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Informe de contenido inapropiado
I support a large CFD code and I've had some job failures using -O2 for ifx version 2025.1 and 2025.2. These jobs run successfully for 2025.0.4. The jobs also run successfully when using -O1 of the 2025.1 or 2025.2. So I believe that there is something about the -O2 option in the latest release. The vast majority of my test cases still run fine with the latest version, so this is not happening for all cases. My question is -- is there some way that I might diagnose the problem? I have added -g -traceback to the compilation arguments, but this only led to a line number that was the last line of a source code file, the end module statement. So I don't know where there might be a problem, or where the numerics of the -O1 case diverge from the -O2 case.
Enlace copiado
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Informe de contenido inapropiado
/O2 /fp:strict
Do either of those change the behaviour? Btw does the source file have lots of routines or just a few? Does it crash quickly or take a long time?

- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Marcar tema como nuevo
- Marcar tema como leído
- Flotar este Tema para el usuario actual
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Página de impresión sencilla