- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I was able to compile and run a fortran code, which required a large memory space. After the compiled code started execution for some time, the code crashed. The following messages showed up on the debug screen:
Loaded 'ntdll.dll', no matching symbolic information found.
Loaded 'C:WINDOWSsystem32kernel32.dll', no matching symbolic information found.
Loaded 'C:PFWorkingSDBCH3DCH3D-SDBCH3D-SDBDebug
etcdf.dll', no matching symbolic information found.
The thread 0xF64 has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program 'C:PFWorkingSDBCH3DCH3D-SDBCH3D-SDBDebugjame_ch3d_transp_sinclair_FC_netCDF.exe' has exited with code 0
Can anyone provide any help on this? What doesthis mean? Thanks.
Link Copied
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I was supplied a code, which contains multiple .for files with some .inc (include files). I also found a UTILIO.ASM file (which may be for utility for input/output). This UTILIO.ASM looks like a source file, but does not look like fortran file. It seems to control the input/output withoperations on screens (erase screen, ... ) Do you have any idea what this file is? How do I compile it into the executable? Thanks...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks, yes I think it is an assembler. I have downloaded Microsoft MSAM. How do I compiles the .for files with the assembler file? My previous experience with DVF has involved only with .for and .inc files.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Those calls will NOT work with most modern compilers that generate 32 pr 64-bit protected mode code.
You may just want to write Fortran replacements for those routines, which at first just do
Print *, "
eventually when the rest of the program is running okay you can go back and patch in the correct modern ways of clearing the screen, burping the baby, etc, etc..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Steve,
for 64-bit development on 64-bit Windows, do you still recommend VS.NET 2003 over VS2005?
Thanks, Roger
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »