Intel® Fortran Compiler
Build applications that can scale for the future with optimized code designed for Intel® Xeon® and compatible processors.
Announcements
Welcome to the Intel Community. If you get an answer you like, please mark it as an Accepted Solution to help others. Thank you!

Visual Studio - immediate window

Leos_P_
Beginner
439 Views

I have noticed that when I am using VS2015 in conjunction with Intel Fortran, when debugging, Immediate window cannot process intrinsic functions. It is aware of all variables but e.g. for SIN(1.0) it gives Undefined variable SIN. Is this by design and there is no way around that or is there something wrong with my configuration?

Thank you.

0 Kudos
1 Solution
Steve_Lionel
Black Belt Retired Employee
439 Views

That's would be a "feature request". It's not a claimed feature of the product today.

View solution in original post

7 Replies
Steve_Lionel
Black Belt Retired Employee
440 Views

That's would be a "feature request". It's not a claimed feature of the product today.

View solution in original post

Leos_P_
Beginner
439 Views

Thank you for explanation.

rase
New Contributor I
439 Views

Hello Steve, I think we are all glad to have you and your valuable contributions back again in this forum. I missed your comments during the last month.

Kevin_D_Intel
Employee
439 Views

@Leos - I will craft a small reproducer and submit a feature enhancement for this (and then update the internal tracking id below).

(Internal tracking id: TBD)

HilarioCastro
Beginner
248 Views

Hello forum fellows, 

Does anybody know if there is already a fix for this issue? I am currently running into the same issue when using Visual Studio 2019.

 

Cheers,

Hilario

andrew_4619
Honored Contributor I
236 Views

I don't think there is anything to fix. This is just not a feature of the debug integration.

 

HilarioCastro
Beginner
226 Views

Hi Andrew, 

Probably I didnt phrase it clearly. I was wondering if the feature had already been implemented.  But it is clear from your answer.

Thank you

Reply