Intel® Fortran Compiler
Build applications that can scale for the future with optimized code designed for Intel® Xeon® and compatible processors.
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs have moved to the Altera Community. Existing Intel Community members can sign in with their current credentials.
29313 Discussions

ifx compiler equivalent flags to /Qunroll-aggressive and /Qinline-forceinline

DataScientist
Valued Contributor I
‎03-02-2024 11:59 PM
671 Views

The `ifx` compiler returns the following warnings:

```

ifx: command line warning #10148: option '/Qunroll-aggressive' not supported
ifx: command line warning #10148: option '/Qinline-forceinline' not supported

```

But the compiler reference does not forbid using the above flags in the ifx compiler.
Are these warnings credible? If so, are there equivalent flags for the `ifx`?

Link Copied

1 Reply
Barbara_P_Intel
Employee
‎03-04-2024 03:19 PM
633 Views

According to the Fortran Developer Guide and reference /Qunroll-aggressive is ifort only. 

I see the same for /Qinline-forceinline., ifort only.

Do you need those options with ifx for performance? LLVM is a whole new backend. What does the optimization report tell you?

 

Copy link
Reply

Community support is provided Monday to Friday. Other contact methods are available here.

Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.

For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.