- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Has anyone else tried using the iso_varying_string.F90 code with ifort 11? I'm using this in a large project which compiles and runs just fine using ifort v10.1. However, if I try to compile with ifort 11 I find that some modules which use the iso_varying_string module work OK, but others don't seem to see the "trim()" and "char()" functions provided by iso_varying_string (resulting in the compiler complaining that the intrinsic trim() function doesn't know what to do with a varying_string type variable).
Just want to know if anyone else has found this problem before I submit a bug report....
Thanks!
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you consult the long string of previous posts on iso_varying_string which you can find in the search box?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you consult the long string of previous posts on iso_varying_string which you can find in the search box?
Yes - but didn't find anything which seemed to describe a similar problem..............
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I just tried the UNITTEST program provided along with ISO_VARYING_STRINGS and had no problems. I'll point out that this module has many problems such as memory leaks.
Can you provide a short source showing the failure? Assume that I have a standard copy of ISO_VARYING_STRINGS.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page