Intel® High Level Design
Support for Intel® High Level Synthesis Compiler, DSP Builder, OneAPI for Intel® FPGAs, Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™
Announcements
Intel Support hours are Monday-Fridays, 8am-5pm PST, except Holidays. Thanks to our community members who provide support during our down time or before we get to your questions. We appreciate you!

Need Forum Guidance? Click here
Search our FPGA Knowledge Articles here.
505 Discussions

Component Done signal remains asserted in FPGA, not in Simulation

derSpieler
Beginner
264 Views

Hello,

I have created a component in HLS which should take a 1280 bit signal (passed by value), and should stream it out in 20 packets of 64-bit each.

The task is simple, and both the simulation and co-simulation in Modelsim work fine.

However, when I integrate this component in my design, I have observed with signalTap that the done signal once asserted for the first time it remains high, it does not go back to 0 after one clock cycle and the component hangs, being impossible to start it again as soon as new input data becomes available.

I have also realized, that if I stream out 3 packets or less, the signal gets properly de-asserted after one clock cycle as I would expect, and the component does not hang.

This is the code I have used:

void component algorithm_1((ac_int<1280> in,  ihc::stream_out<ac_int<64,false>,
                        ihc::firstSymbolInHighOrderBits<false>> &out_stream))
{
  ac_int<64> result = 0;

  for (char i = 0; i<20; i++)
    {
      result = (in >> 64*i) & 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ;
      out_stream.write(result);
    }
}

 

What could be the reason why the Done signal remains asserted? I have checked the internals of the component, but I have not found any FIFO overflow on the IOWR

Thanks for your help

0 Kudos
1 Reply
AnilErinch_A_Intel
153 Views

Hi ,

Can you share the signal tap waveforms for the 3 packets scenario and hanging scenario.

Also can you please let us know the status of the stall signal when the component hangs.

Thanks and Regards

Anil


Reply