Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives
Deliberate problems developing high-performance vision, signal, security, and storage applications.
공지
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
6814 토론

G729 Codec IPP 8.2 doesn't perform better than non IPP implementation

santosh_k_
초급자
659 조회수

Hi,

we recently bought Intel® Parallel Studio XE 2015 which has IPP 8.2 version. we are using them with Intel samples for G729 speech codec. I tried using intel 8.0 samples and Intel 6.1 samples. Both of them are not giving better performance than our own implementation. we also have IPP of 6.1 version which is giving better performance than 8.2.

I linked 6.1 G729 samples with 6.1 version and 8.2 version of IPPs out of both 6.1 version gives better performance.

IPP 6.1 version linked with 6.1 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 21 microsec

IPP 6.1 version linked with 8.2 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 42 microsec

IPP 8.0 version linked with 8.2 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 46 microsec

Current platform is:

OS: windriver (3.4.43-WR5.0.1.13_standard)

Hardware:  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz

Regards

Santosh kasula

0 포인트
2 응답
Igor_A_Intel
직원
659 조회수

Hi Santosh,

what do you mean under "8.2 version sample"? according to the sticky message at the top of the forum topics you can see that since 8.0 version IPP doesn't support umc samples and has moved them to legacy.

regards, Igor

0 포인트
Tang_C_
초급자
659 조회수

HI,Santosh

 I meet the same problem, when i use sample 7.0  g729 under ipp7.0, CPU 61%, but use  samples 8.0 under 8.2, CPU 77%

 in addition, by your testing,

IPP 6.1 version linked with 6.1 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 21 microsec

IPP 6.1 version linked with 8.2 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 42 microsec

IPP 8.0 version linked with 8.2 version sample  avg per/frame encode time: 46 microsec

but i test the encode time about 110 microsec per/frame, can you tell how to optimize option to compile the sample and application,thank you very much

 CPU model name    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz

 

0 포인트
응답