- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi,

Alot many functions like ippsTone_Direct_32f/sinc etc are deprecated. Is there any replacement function for them? We use ippsTone_Direct_xx and ippsr_sinc alot in our application. Is ot possible to include them in sp library and not deprecated.

If not, them is the combination of slope/ramp function wit ipps_sin/ipps_cos is faster in execution. We need faster replacement for these API. Kindly suggest if IPP sin/cos is faster compared to tone. How the ipps_cos/sin implemented.

Regards

Rohit

Link Copied

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

**How the ipps_cos/sin implemented**... That was already explained many times on different IDZ forums that Intel does not release any details on how some API is implemented or what algorithms are used. With regard to deprecated functions: Please consider to make a feedback on usage of functions you need at: . http://software.intel.com/sites/products/ipp-deprecated-features-feedback. Thanks in advance.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi,

ok, but can you shed some input on the speed of execution of IPP sin/cos when compared to direct tone?

Regards

Rohit

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

**Vector Math**domain: ... IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_32f_A11, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_32f_A21, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_32f_A24, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_64f_A26, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_64f_A50, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_64f_A53, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_32f_A11, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_32f_A21, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_32f_A24, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_64f_A26, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_64f_A50, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_64f_A53, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n)) ... and performance is related to a precision ( Axx suffix ). It is Not clear what precision do you need in case of '_32f_' functions?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi,

Following are the function we would be using in our application to replace (IppStatus ippsTone_Direct_32fc(Ipp32fc* pDst, int len, float magn, float rFreq, float* pPhase, IppHintAlgorithmhint); and IppStatus ippsTone_Direct_64fc(Ipp64fc* pDst, int len, double magn, double rFreq, double* pPhase, IppHintAlgorithmhint);

IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_32f_A24, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n))

IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAcos_64f_A53, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n))

IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_64f_A53, (const Ipp64f a[],Ipp64f r[],Ipp32s n))

IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippsAsin_32f_A24, (const Ipp32f a[],Ipp32f r[],Ipp32s n))

Can you now tell me if these functions are slower or faster on a intel i5and i7 platform.We would limit to SSE2 support only.

Regards

Rohit

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page