Intel® Quartus® Prime Software
Intel® Quartus® Prime Design Software, Design Entry, Synthesis, Simulation, Verification, Timing Analysis, System Design (Platform Designer, formerly Qsys)
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
17268 Discussions

New machine for compiling designs

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
1,190 Views

I'm about to buy a new box to act as my new build machine for Quartus II. 

 

I have the option of choosing 1 of the following 2 options: 

 

Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E8500 with VT (3.16GHz, 6M, 1333MHz FSB) 

or 

Intel® Core™ 2 Quad Q9400 with VT (2.66GHz, 6M, 1333MHz FSB) 

 

What do you think would be faster? 

 

More cores? or a faster clock speed?
0 Kudos
2 Replies
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
378 Views

My experience has been that multiple cores don't really help when compiling in Quartus. This may be design dependent, but I would probably go with the faster clock speed if Quartus was my only concern. 

 

On the other hand, when compiling Nios code, the extra cores generally make a big difference. For example, running "make -j4" to use four cores can be almost four times as fast as using one core.
0 Kudos
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
378 Views

Nota Bene : Quartus II Web Edition uses only one core. So no interest to multiple core in this case. 

 

Hyper threading could improve performance. 

CPU with high cache will help a lot. 

RAM : huge size, prefer QDR (faster than DDR)... 

 

I suggest you to see requirements by quartus for targeted fpga : they are different for each FPGA size and class. see literature page on www.altera.com 

For high FPGA, I think that you must have 64bits hardware and operating system. 

 

Regards.
0 Kudos
Reply