- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
How can this be done in a minimally invasive way?
I want to write an enclave that generates a symmetric session key from the DH secret derived during RA to be used for secret provisioning, as is recommended in all SGX references.
I conjecture one has to override some of the callback functions fed to sgx_ra_proc_msg2. Is that true? If so, and if not, how would you recommend I should go about it?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
After reading the SDK Developer's Reference a bit, I realized that sgx_ra_init_ex should be used instead of sgx_ra_init.
Using the former function you can provide a callback function that customizes key derivation from the shared DH secret.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
After reading the SDK Developer's Reference a bit, I realized that sgx_ra_init_ex should be used instead of sgx_ra_init.
Using the former function you can provide a callback function that customizes key derivation from the shared DH secret.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page