I have a RAID 6 array with 10 2TB SATA HDDs attach to RES2CV240(ph13 F/W).
And I use Hard Disk Sentinel to monitor HDDs' SMART status.
When HD Sentinel start or refresh status (default 5 minutes), the MegaRAID Storage Manager shows several warnings and informations, like:
Controller ID: 0 Unexpected sense: PD = 8-Invaild field in CDB, CDB = 0x5a 0x00 0x1c 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xfc 0x00, Sense: 0x70 0x00 0x05 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0a 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x24 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
Controller ID: 0 Unexpected sense: PD = 8-Invaild field in CDB, CDB = 0x4d 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xfc 0x00, Sense: 0x70 0x00 0x05 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0a 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x24 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
Controller ID: 0 PD Reset: PD = 8, Error = 3, Path = 0x5001E673D9DDDFFD
Controller ID: 0 PD Reset: PD = 8, Error = 3, Path = 0x5001E673D9DDDFFD
The TTY Log is:
04/20/16 21:03:07: DM: Chip 0 Paused
04/20/16 21:03:07: Chip <0> Slots: Cur=[164]
04/20/16 21:03:07: [a6]= 1
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM: Timing wheel expired - Chip 0 Slot a6
04/20/16 21:03:09: Chip <0> Slots: Cur=[166]
04/20/16 21:03:09: [a6]= 1
04/20/16 21:03:09: TIMEOUT: rdm 6055be00, devHandle 0014, mid 0975, Cmd 09, devId 0008, devState 0020, devFlags 1400005
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_TMWheelScanAllMsg (slot a6):Scanned 1, Timeout 1 Msg mask 21000
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_SetTMReqForDevH: tm request for deviceHandle[14] devid[8] path[0] tmRequired[1], tmActive[0], countReqTM[1] countActiveTM:0 flags:1400005 devState:20 tmReqAlt:0 tmActAlt:0
04/20/16 21:03:09: MPT_ProcessTaskMgmtQueue: Task Mgmt Start Addr c113b900 DevId[8] Index 8ff chip 0 type 3 numCmdIssued 2 cQDepth :1 devFlags:1482005 state:20 devHdl:14
04/20/16 21:03:09: EVT# 02746-04/20/16 21:03:09: 268=Encl PD 08 Path 5001e673d9dddffd reset (Type 03)
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_IssuePendingTMs: reqd 0000 active 0001 countTmIssued 0001, nextDevH 15
04/20/16 21:03:09: iopiEvent: EVENT_SAS_DISCOVERY
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_HandleDiscEvent: Discovery started on Port 0
04/20/16 21:03:09: terminatated pRdm 6055be00 flags=21 TimeOutC=2 RetryC=1 Request c1142f00 Reply 60dd5e40 iocStatus 0048 retryC 1 devId:8 devFlags=1482005 iocLogInfo:31140000
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_ProcessDevWaitQueue: Task mgmt in process devId=x
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_HandleTopologyChgEvnt: PhysicalPort=0 NumEntries=1 StartPhyNum=18
04/20/16 21:03:09: - Exp RESPONDING
04/20/16 21:03:09: MPT_HandleTopologyChgEvnt: curr_lr=0xa, prev_lr=0xa, DM_DevMgrIsReady=1
04/20/16 21:03:09: MPT_TaskMgmtPostRoutine: TMIdx 8ff DevID[8] IOCStatus 0000 MsgAddr c113b900 type 3 chip 0 devhandle 14 numCmdIssued 281 Qdepth 0 TermCount 1 DevWQC 1 ChipWQC 0 retryCount 0 tmDevHandle:14 flags: 1480005
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_IssuePendingTMs: reqd 0000 active 0000 countTmIssued 0000, nextDevH 15
04/20/16 21:03:09: SES device 8 Reset - Queued for 14 secs delay
04/20/16 21:03:09: iopiEvent: EVENT_SAS_DISCOVERY
04/20/16 21:03:09: DM_HandleDiscEvent: Discovery Completed on Port 0
04/20/16 21:03:23: MPT_TaskMgmtSesCallback: device handle=14, path=0, Chip=0, devId=8, timerId=370, devhandle path=0
04/20/16 21:03:23: DM_DevPathRemoveSM : devHandle[14] devId[8], path [0], currState [3] nextState [5] state [3], devState[20], devFlags[1400005] curPath:0 removalState:3 curQDepth:0 devState:20
04/20/16 21:03:23: EVT# 02747-04/20/16 21:03:23: 113=Unexpected sense: Encl PD 08 Path 5001e673d9dddffd, CDB: 4d 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 fc 00, Sense: 5/24/00
04/20/16 21:03:23: Raw Sense for PD 8: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 24 00 00 00 00 00
04/20/16 21:03:23: EVT# 02748-04/20/16 21:03:23: 113=Unexpected sense: Encl PD 08 Path 5001e673d9dddffd, CDB: 5a 00 1c 00 00 00 00 00 fc 00, Sense: 5/24/00
04/20/16 21:03:23: Raw Sense for PD 8: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 24 00 00 00 00 00
When it happed, the read and writh speed of the array drop to ~10MB/s, as normal is ~500MB/s.
Both LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i and LSI Nytro MegaRAID 8110-4i have the same situation.
Is there any solution?
Or just the RES2CV240 can not handle a SATA PIO command?
Hello,
We notice that you are using LSI RAID controllers. Intel RAID expanders are validated to work only with Intel RAID controllers reason why we recommend opening a ticket with LSI* since the issue could be related to compatibility between the components.
链接已复制
Hello,
We notice that you are using LSI RAID controllers. Intel RAID expanders are validated to work only with Intel RAID controllers reason why we recommend opening a ticket with LSI* since the issue could be related to compatibility between the components.
