Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
Ask questions and share information with other developers who use Intel® Math Kernel Library.

Batch DGEMM Fortran example?

AlphaF20
New Contributor I
389 Views

Hi,

 

  I saw https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/introducing-batch-gemm-operations.html

  mentioned batch DGEMM with an example in C. It mentioned 

" It has Fortran 77 and Fortran 95 APIs, and also CBLAS bindings. It is available in Intel MKL 11.3 Beta and later releases. Refer to the reference manual for additional documentation. "

 

  I cannot find the reference manual for Fortran. Is there any example for Fortran about batch DGEMM? Perhaps I don't need "CblasRowMajor".

 

Thank you very much

0 Kudos
1 Solution
MRajesh_intel
Moderator
362 Views

Hi,


This is a reference document:

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/onemkl-developer-reference-fortra...


You can find the examples in oneAPI/mkl/latest/examples folder and extract the examples_core_f.zip.


After extracting the folder you can find the example of dgemm_batch in blas/source folder.


Regards

Rajesh






View solution in original post

3 Replies
MRajesh_intel
Moderator
363 Views

Hi,


This is a reference document:

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/onemkl-developer-reference-fortra...


You can find the examples in oneAPI/mkl/latest/examples folder and extract the examples_core_f.zip.


After extracting the folder you can find the example of dgemm_batch in blas/source folder.


Regards

Rajesh






MRajesh_intel
Moderator
339 Views

Hi,

 

Can you please let us know if your issue has been resolved.

 

Regards

Rajesh.

 

MRajesh_intel
Moderator
326 Views

Hi,

 

Thanks for accepting as a Solution. As this issue has been resolved, we will no longer respond to this thread. If you require any additional assistance from Intel, please start a new thread. Any further interaction in this thread will be considered community only.

Have a Good day.

 

Regards

Rajesh

 

Reply