- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi, there is command line for the build an Intel example pardiso_sym_f90.f90
ifort pardiso_sym_f90.f90 -I/opt/intel/mkl/include /opt/intel/mkl/lib/libmkl_core.a /opt/intel/mkl/lib/libmkl_intel_ilp64.a /opt/intel/mkl/lib/libmkl_intel_thread.a /opt/intel/lib/libiomp5.a
Compiling and linking was successful. However, a running output file (a.out) was not a beautiful so,
Reordering completed ...
The following ERROR was detected: -1
The following ERROR on release stage was detected: -1
Thank you for any help!
Malik.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
HI Malik,
Could i ask you to set msglvl and iparm[26] to 1 and publish new output here?
Thanks,
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Alexander!
Yes, I was made this. The same result :(
Reordering completed ...
The following ERROR was detected: -1
The following ERROR on release stage was detected: -1
1
192:bin mmax$
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Malik,
That's strange. You link and run mkl example without any changes, correct? Which version of MKL do you use?
Thanks,
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Alexander,
Thank you for you respond. No, I can't change anything in MKL binaries off course. No additiotional links or header files new. Only Intel example EXACTLY. However, with the changes you recommended (iparm(26)=1).
PS. I have a latest Parallel Studio 2018 with MKL, I'm sure .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
please add -i8 compiler option or try to link with libmkl_intel_lp64.a instead of libmkl_intel_ilp64.a
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
MANY THANKS GENNADY, THANKS MY FRIEND!
YES! It was successful after the changing to _lp64 the _ilp64 instead!
Sincerely,
Malik.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
And quick comment - in fortran it's better to use iparm(27) to 1 instead iparm(26) to turn on matrix checker :)
Thanks,
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Alexander Kalinkin (Intel) wrote:
And quick comment - in fortran it's better to use iparm(27) to 1 instead iparm(26) to turn on matrix checker :)
Thanks,
Alex
Thank you Alex, I will do. :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You are very welcome. Hope that you will find pardiso functionality fine :)
Thanks,
Alex
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page