Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Shigeo_Kobayashi
Beginner
35 Views

DataFitting bug ?

Pls run the program bellow,and confirm the difference between NY==1 and NY==2 case.

DFTaskPtr  task;
 // int NY = 2;
 int NY = 1;
 double x[] = {1,2, 3, 4,  5};
 double y[] = {0,2,-1,-0.5,0,-1,1,-2,-1.5,-1};
 int    NX  = sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]);
 int order  = 1;
 int dorder[] = { 0,0 };
 int ndorder = sizeof(dorder)/sizeof(dorder[0]);
 double coef[20];
 double xv   = 0.0;
 double yv[2];
 int status;
 status = dfdNewTask1D( &task,NX,x, DF_NON_UNIFORM_PARTITION, NY, y, DF_MATRIX_STORAGE_ROWS );
 status = dfdEditPPSpline1D(task, DF_PP_LINEAR, DF_PP_DEFAULT, DF_NO_BC , NULL, DF_NO_IC, NULL, coef, DF_NO_HINT);
 status = dfdConstruct1D( task, DF_PP_SPLINE, DF_METHOD_STD );
 for(int i=1;i<=NX;++i)
 {
  xv = i;
  status = dfdInterpolate1D( task, DF_INTERP, DF_METHOD_PP, 1, &xv, DF_NON_UNIFORM_PARTITION, ndorder, dorder, NULL, yv, DF_MATRIX_STORAGE_ROWS, NULL );
  if(NY==2) printf("status = %d x=%g y=[%g,%g]\n",status,xv,yv[0],yv[1]);
  else      printf("status = %d x=%g y=[%g]\n",status,xv,yv[0]);
 }

===== the results when NY=1 follow
status = 0 x=1 y=[0]
status = 0 x=2 y=[-1.5]    <= why not 2.0 ? 
status = 0 x=3 y=[-1]
status = 0 x=4 y=[-0.5]
status = 0 x=5 y=[0]

===== the results when NY=2 follow
status = 0 x=1 y=[0,-1]
status = 0 x=2 y=[2,1]   <= Yes OK!
status = 0 x=3 y=[-1,-2]
status = 0 x=4 y=[-0.5,-1.5]
status = 0 x=5 y=[0,-1]
------------------------------------------------
I got the results under  MKL V11.1.1 Product Build 20131010 for 32-bit application on Windows-7.

 

0 Kudos
8 Replies
Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
35 Views

thanks, we will check this case.

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
35 Views

yes, it looks a bug. the issue is escalated. we will update this thread in the case any news.

35 Views

Hello Shigeo Kobayashi,

The test case you have provided reproduces a bug in MKL 11.1.1. dfdinterpolate1D function has an issue with processing small tasks when ny = 1 and nsite = 1, like in your example.

This issue was also revealed by our internal testing and the fix is planned for the next MKL 11.1 update. Currently you could use a workaround: Please use nsite = 2 and pass array of 2 elements as an array of interpolation sites to obtain correct results.

Shigeo_Kobayashi
Beginner
35 Views

Hi Victoriya,
Thank you for your comment. Yes,I wait for the next MKL release(this month?).  

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
35 Views

yes

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
35 Views

Shigeo,

the fix of the problem you can find into 11.1 update2 released yesterday. Would you please check the issue with this update and let us know the results.

--Gennady

Shigeo_Kobayashi
Beginner
35 Views

Hi Gennady,
Yes, I downloaded 11.1 update2 and got correct results today.
Thank you and all MKL people !!

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
35 Views

another issue with performance, we are going to fix the next update. We will keep you updated with the status. Regards, Gennady

 

Reply