Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
Ask questions and share information with other developers who use Intel® Math Kernel Library.
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
7234 Discussions

ZGESVD returning wrong singular values when lwork is large

John_Young
New Contributor I
649 Views

Hi,

Attached is a test case showing the ZGESVD returning wrong singular values when lwork is large.  The test matrix is an identity matrix so that all singular values should be 1.  If I choose lwork to be the minimum required value specified by the documenation, then I see no issues.  When I query ZGESVD for the optimum lwork using lwork = -1, then the singular values are no longer all 1.  Furthermore, the efficiency of the ZGESVD routine drops drastically.  For some values of lwork, the routine seems to run forever and I have to kill it. 

I'm using MKL 11.3.1 Product Build 20151021 under linux with 8-byte integer default (ILP64 library).  I have observed the same issue under windows as well.  My compile line is

     ifort -i8 -module . test.F90 -L$INTEL_MKL_LIBS -liomp5 -lmkl_intel_ilp64 -lmkl_core -lmkl_intel_thread -lpthread -lm

The output of the test routine is

 OpenMP:                      0
 Intel(R) Math Kernel Library Version 11.3.1 Product Build 20151021 for Intel(R)
  64 architecture applications

 SUM:  (5868.00000000000,0.000000000000000E+000)
 Starting SVD TRY 1                  5868                  5868
 LWORK :                 17604
 Condition #:    1.00000000000000
 Done with SVD TRY 1
 Starting SVD TRY 2                  5868                  5868
 LWORK :                645480
 Condition #:    11.9444068944964
 Done with SVD TRY 2
 Starting SVD TRY 3                  5868                  5868
 LWORK :                 58680
^Cforrtl: error (69): process interrupted (SIGINT)

 

 

 

0 Kudos
1 Reply
Ying_H_Intel
Moderator
649 Views

Hi John, 

Thank for let us know. We will look into it and get back to you if any news.

Thanks

Ying . 

 

0 Kudos
Reply