Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
Ask questions and share information with other developers who use Intel® Math Kernel Library.
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.

declaring as pure?

tracyx
New Contributor I
1,115 Views
I'm using some VML routines (for calculating things including the normal cdf, inverse normal cdf). I'd like to call these from functions/subroutines declared as pure. If I change the respective interface block to include the pure keyword, my code compiles and executes as expected. Is this safe? Thanks.
0 Kudos
3 Replies
Chao_Y_Intel
Moderator
1,115 Views

Hello,

How do you change the function declaration by adding pure? For example, for the following function, virngpoisson( method, stream, n, r, lambda )

Only the output vector, and stream may be changed after the function call. It has no other side effect. If they are taken as the output value, it is fine to define the subroutine as pure.

Thanks,
Chao

0 Kudos
tracyx
New Contributor I
1,115 Views
I haven't used the routine you mentioned, but for one I have (to compute normal cdf), I just add the following interface in my (pure) subroutine which calls this.

[fortran]interface
  pure subroutine vdcdfnorm(n,a,r)
    integer,intent(in)         :: n
    real(kind=8),intent(in)    :: a(n)
    real(kind=8),intent(out)   :: r(n)
  end subroutine
end interface[/fortran]

Is this OK?
0 Kudos
Chao_Y_Intel
Moderator
1,115 Views
Hello,
It is fine for this one. r is the only output forthis function.

Thanks,
Chao
0 Kudos
Reply