- Marcar como novo
- Marcador
- Subscrever
- Silenciar
- Subscrever fonte RSS
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar conteúdo inapropriado
hi,
The intel manual says iparm[2] can only be 0, 2 or 3. What happens if this has been set to 1? (It does not throw any error)
Thanks
Dinesh
Link copiado
- Marcar como novo
- Marcador
- Subscrever
- Silenciar
- Subscrever fonte RSS
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar conteúdo inapropriado
Hi Dinesh,
For this case, if you set iparm[2] to 1, you probably could not reduce the time spent for reordering the matrix. And you will get error message on the top Pardiso summary "PARDISO Internationalization error. Message 164 is unknown."
- Marcar como novo
- Marcador
- Subscrever
- Silenciar
- Subscrever fonte RSS
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar conteúdo inapropriado
In general, if you assign disallowed values to arguments, or fail to assign any value to arguments, anything may happen. When library routines are designed, a trade-off has to be made between performance and error-checking. When the number of arguments is large or the arguments are complex the cost of error-checking can be quite high, so it is not performed. (By "complex" I mean arrays or of a type with several components, not complex in the mathematical sense)
An analogy may help. There is a one-way street here with a speed limit of 35 (miles per hour). What happens if my speed is 45? What about -25?
- Marcar como novo
- Marcador
- Subscrever
- Silenciar
- Subscrever fonte RSS
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar conteúdo inapropriado
Hi Fiona,
What I noticed that, it seemed like the routine worked, for single processor and two processor. But with the higher number of processors, it seemed like working fine, however produced a message***Cannot bisect a graph with 0 vertices!***
Dinesh
- Subscrever fonte RSS
- Marcar tópico como novo
- Marcar tópico como lido
- Flutuar este Tópico para o utilizador atual
- Marcador
- Subscrever
- Página amigável para impressora