Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
Ask questions and share information with other developers who use Intel® Math Kernel Library.
Announcements
This community is designed for sharing of public information. Please do not share Intel or third-party confidential information here.

pardiso factorization speed

may_ka
Beginner
510 Views

Hi,

 

when using pardiso on an upper triangular symmetric matrix of dimension 130,00 x 130,000 with 1,000,000 non-zeros it needs about 15 sec for a factorization, which is very slow compared to cholmod(suitesparse) 0.3 sec.

 

Further on large matrices, say >1,000,000 x >1,000,000 pardiso is so unbearable slow that it becomes unusable, whereas cholmod(suitesparse) can easily cope with the problem.

 

Is there any way to speed up pardiso? I figured that it gets stuck at the analysis stage.

 

I am using oneapi version 2021.2.0 on linux, kernel version 5.16.

 

Thanks

0 Kudos
10 Replies
Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
482 Views

The only way to speed up the reordering stage is by trying the OpenMP version of Metis (iparm[1]=3).

wrt to factorization performance against cholmod -- here make sense to share the case to check the behavior on our end.



may_ka
Beginner
472 Views

Hi,

I'll make an example.

 

Question is how I can get he matrix to Intel? My current best example matrix with 12M rows/columns and 500M elements needs 11GB on disk!

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
466 Views

You could upload the case anywhere ( google drive as an example) and give us the link by the private channel into this forum or directly via email ( Gennady.Fedorov@intel.com). And please add the driver which will write this matrix and run the solver with your parameters. It will essentially save the reproducing time.

-Gennady


may_ka
Beginner
453 Views

Hi,

 

I have emailed you a link for downloading an archive with matrix and driver.

 

The example also reproduces the observation from this thread https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/omp-warning-when-using-pardiso-and-m... 

 

Thanks for looking into this.

may_ka
Beginner
386 Views

Hi,

 

@Gennady_F_Intel wondering whether you had the time yet to look into the example provided?

 

I just installed oneapi 2022.0.2, and all the described problems remain, even the omp_nested warning from this thread 

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
343 Views

I am very sorry, Karl. I missed this thread and will do it asap.


may_ka
Beginner
261 Views

Hi Gennady,

 

I responded to your email some time ago pointing out that there must be an issue at your side reading the sparse array in binary.

 

Is there any update on this?

 

Best

Gennady_F_Intel
Moderator
249 Views

Hi Karl,

I responded by email to you on this matter.

The reordering performance problem has been reproduced on our end and escalated against the Sparse Solver Team.

We will keep this thread updated in case of any updates.

thanks,

Gennady


may_ka
Beginner
189 Views

Hi,

 

I had contacted the pardiso team about this problem as well, and according to their test and a test library they provided to me the problem does not affect the most recent pardiso version.

 

Does Intel have any plans for updating pardiso?

 

Thanks.

Khang_N_Intel
Employee
87 Views

Hi Karl,


I just want to let you know that the team is still investigating this issue.

We will let you know once we find out the issue.


Best regards,

Khang


Reply