- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I have encountered an issue compiling my OpenCL kernel using the Intel CPU-only runtime (v16.1.1) on RHEL 7 (x64).
I've created a MWE in a github gist here
(using pyopencl to compile / setup args, etc.)
Essentially, if my kernel "testkernel" calls the "bad" subkernel (defined as a __kernel function with required work group size), I get this segfault. If I change the kernel definition to the "good" subkernel (a simple "void" function call) it compiles and runs correctly. However, the OpenCL standard seems to imply the two should be identical:
>The __kernel
(or kernel
) qualifier declares a function to be a kernel that can be executed by an application on an OpenCL device(s). The following rules apply to functions that are declared with this qualifier:
>It is just a regular function call if a __kernel
function is called by another kernel function.
In any case, it probably shouldn't be giving me segfaults!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
output:
PYOPENCL_CTX='' PYOPENCL_COMPILER_OUTPUT=1 python2.7 test.py broken.opencl
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'PrepareKernelArgs' on module 'main'.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
PYOPENCL_CTX='' PYOPENCL_COMPILER_OUTPUT=1 python2.7 test.py working.opencl
/home/ncurtis/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyopencl/cffi_cl.py:1502: CompilerWarning: From-source build succeeded, but resulted in non-empty logs:
Build on <pyopencl.Device 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 v2 @ 2.20GHz' on 'Intel(R) OpenCL' at 0x31b5678> succeeded, but said:
Compilation started
Compilation done
Linking started
Linking done
Device build started
Device build done
Kernel <bad> was successfully vectorized (4)
Kernel <testkernel> was not vectorized
Done.
warn(text, CompilerWarning
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Nick
p.s. any update on a new release of the CPU-only runtime?? It would be nice to get some of the bugfixes applied (and even better to try out OCL 2.0+)
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Has this bug been logged by any chance? It's been ~a month of no response :/
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page