- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Why doesn't Intel invent a node process naming convention that equates to speed?
1 Solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I think I probably misunderstand. I am thinking about measuring the CPU more than a single transistor. What would a "special instruction" for a transistor be? Apply electricity from all directions? Lol. I guess the speed would be 0 leakage.
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Speed of what? Careful how you answer; this isn't as simple as you think...
...S
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Speed of a special instruction?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I think I probably misunderstand. I am thinking about measuring the CPU more than a single transistor. What would a "special instruction" for a transistor be? Apply electricity from all directions? Lol. I guess the speed would be 0 leakage.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page