- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello all,
i am now upgrade from using stratix iii to stratix IV, what i know is that stratix IV is 45n technology, but stratix iii is a 65n technology. i expected that when synthesizing the same design on startix iii and IV, stratix IV may give a high performance than startix iii, but the delay i got from stratix iii using Classic Timing Analyzer and TimeQuest Timing Analyzer is better than the delay i got in stratix IV using the TimeQuest Timing Analyzer. I kept the same optimization options in both projects. Please anyone have an explanation for this issue ? I am using Quartus II v. 9.0 on centos, and my design is approximately has 2700 ALUTs. Thanks in Advance Best Regards.Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Hello all, i am now upgrade from using stratix iii to stratix IV, what i know is that stratix IV is 45n technology, but stratix iii is a 65n technology. i expected that when synthesizing the same design on startix iii and IV, stratix IV may give a high performance than startix iii, but the delay i got from stratix iii using Classic Timing Analyzer and TimeQuest Timing Analyzer is better than the delay i got in stratix IV using the TimeQuest Timing Analyzer. I kept the same optimization options in both projects. Please anyone have an explanation for this issue ? I am using Quartus II v. 9.0 on centos, and my design is approximately has 2700 ALUTs. Thanks in Advance Best Regards. --- Quote End --- Hi, did you convert all your timing assignments into the SDC-file ? What about the speed grade of the device ? Be aware that TimeQuest treats the detected clocks as related. Kind regards GPK

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page