Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
TimP
Black Belt
39 Views

gcc cilkplus non-support of reducers (other than int type ?)

problem confirmed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473

Don't know the answer to the question about int vs. size_t for min|max_ind reducers.  Note that Intel cilk(tm) plus uses size_t in several contexts where they must be cast to (int) in order to attain satisfactory performance, but the reducers in question don't give good performance, so may be using size_t internally.

0 Kudos
1 Reply
TimP
Black Belt
39 Views

(reposting) a comment was added to the bugzilla hinting that gcc cilkplus is likely not to get future support, following earlier comments that they didn't know whether Intel remained interested.

Reply