FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
Success! Subscription added.
Success! Subscription removed.
Sorry, you must verify to complete this action. Please click the verification link in your email. You may re-send via your
profile.
Don't know the answer to the question about int vs. size_t for min|max_ind reducers. Note that Intel cilk(tm) plus uses size_t in several contexts where they must be cast to (int) in order to attain satisfactory performance, but the reducers in question don't give good performance, so may be using size_t internally.
(reposting) a comment was added to the bugzilla hinting that gcc cilkplus is likely not to get future support, following earlier comments that they didn't know whether Intel remained interested.
