Re: SharedLibs in Nano-X

Altera_Forum · ‎06-23-2009

Hello,

I would like to use SharedLibs in MicroWindows Librairies options, but during the compilation I had this error:

<div class='codetop'>CODE</div><div class='codemain' style='height:200px;white-space:pre;overflow:auto'>/opt/nios2/bin/nios2-linux-uclibc-ld.real: -shared not supported</div>

Why? What is the solution?

Thanks for your help.

Chris

Altera_Forum · ‎06-23-2009

The current "NIOS2nommu" architecture does not support shared libraries. The upcoming MMU-enabled full-Linux "NIOS2" architecture will support shared libraries.

But anyway, I am happily using NANO-X without shared libraries.

-Michael

Altera_Forum · ‎07-02-2009

Thanks Michael.

Other question, is it possible to have a web browser with only 16MB RAM memory?

Because when I start uClinux, I have only 8MB free memory and Links doesn't start. (page allocation problem)

And when I use a small zImage (without graphics drivers for exemple) I have 10MB free memory, I can start Links but when I want open an url, I have a problem => ERROR: out of memory...

Thanks

Chris

Altera_Forum · ‎07-02-2009

I suppose you are speaking of a graphical web browser. A text based browser should be no problem, but graphical: I don't know.

-Michael

Altera_Forum · ‎07-08-2009

Ok, now, browser Links starts in text mode without problems.

But in graphical mode, I had a problem with DirectFB lib

> links -g

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| DirectFB 1.2.3 |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

----------------------------------------------------------------

(*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2009-07-08 08:37)

(!) DirectFB/core/system: No system found!

Could not initialize any graphics driver. Tried the following drivers:

directfb:

No (suitable) implementation found!</div>

Did you have this problem Michael?

Thanks for your help

Chris

Altera_Forum · ‎07-08-2009

Right now I am working on another branch (without a framebuffer enabled), so I can't check into this easily. I'll do so when this branch is successfully finished.

I seem to remember that there had been a discussion on DirectFB, here, but, alas, all seems to be lost....

-Michael