Analyzers
Talk to fellow users of Intel Analyzer tools (Intel VTune™ Profiler, Intel Advisor)
5130 Discussions

Microarchitecture Exploration result is incorrect when the sampling time longer than tens of secs

g199209
Beginner
1,234 Views

VTune 2023.1.0

Linux 3.10.0

CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE

 

Self-checker logs is the same as  https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Why-quot-Contested-Accesses-quot-metric-in-microarchitecture 

 

g199209_0-1681460449028.png

 

g199209_1-1681460467920.png

 

When I manually stop sampling at about 10s, the result seems correct:

 

g199209_2-1681460530847.png

 

But when I let my program run a bit longer, the result is incorrect:

 

g199209_3-1681460589615.png

 

 

0 Kudos
1 Solution
DiyaN_Intel
Moderator
1,158 Views

Hi, 

 

Thank you for posting in Intel Communities.

The errors and the wrong results you must be getting due to the unsupported OS that you are using.

Can you please follow the document in the given link  and try to use a supported OS and try to do the task again?

 

In the above link you can find all the supported OS for Linux/Windows Host and Target systems as well as the deprecated OS in the current release which will be removed in a future release:

DiyaN_Intel_0-1681735058758.png

DiyaN_Intel_1-1681735134503.png

DiyaN_Intel_3-1681735211594.png

 

I hope it helps to resolve your issue. 

If this resolves your issue, make sure to accept this as a solution.

This would help others with similar issues. Thank you!

 

Thanks and Regards,

Diya

 

 

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
5 Replies
g199209
Beginner
1,220 Views

Another problem in Microarchitecture Exploration. The Process & module info in Bottom-up analysis is incorrect, which is correct in hotspot analysis.

 

Test program: Sample matrix project.

 

hotspot, which is correct:

 

g199209_0-1681464410535.png

g199209_1-1681464446863.png

 

Microarchitecture Exploration:

 

g199209_2-1681464486840.png

 

g199209_3-1681464533050.png

 

g199209_4-1681464551882.png

 

The process name & module name is wrong.

 

And I'm not interested in kernel related code, can I filter them, like in hotspot analysis.

0 Kudos
g199209
Beginner
1,218 Views

@g199209 wrote:

Another problem in Microarchitecture Exploration. The Process & module info in Bottom-up analysis is incorrect, which is correct in hotspot analysis.


I think it's a bug in sampling driver. The process & module info is correct when I unloading all sampling drivers and use driverless mode.

 

g199209_0-1681465401466.png

 

0 Kudos
g199209
Beginner
1,214 Views

@g199209 wrote:

VTune 2023.1.0

Linux 3.10.0

CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE

 

When I manually stop sampling at about 10s, the result seems correct:

But when I let my program run a bit longer, the result is incorrect:


@DiyaN_Intel This problem do not exist in the "deprecated" 2023.0.0 macOS remote Linux mode, it works fine... I found 2023.1.0 native Linux version has more bugs. 

0 Kudos
DiyaN_Intel
Moderator
1,159 Views

Hi, 

 

Thank you for posting in Intel Communities.

The errors and the wrong results you must be getting due to the unsupported OS that you are using.

Can you please follow the document in the given link  and try to use a supported OS and try to do the task again?

 

In the above link you can find all the supported OS for Linux/Windows Host and Target systems as well as the deprecated OS in the current release which will be removed in a future release:

DiyaN_Intel_0-1681735058758.png

DiyaN_Intel_1-1681735134503.png

DiyaN_Intel_3-1681735211594.png

 

I hope it helps to resolve your issue. 

If this resolves your issue, make sure to accept this as a solution.

This would help others with similar issues. Thank you!

 

Thanks and Regards,

Diya

 

 

0 Kudos
DiyaN_Intel
Moderator
1,131 Views

Hi,


Glad to know that your issue is resolved. Thanks for accepting our solution. 

If you need any additional information, please post a new question as this thread will no longer be monitored by Intel.


Thanks and Regards,

Diya



0 Kudos
Reply