Analyzers
Talk to fellow users of Intel Analyzer tools (Intel VTune™ Profiler, Intel Advisor)
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.

Uninitialized memory access caused by IPP routines

Mikhail_Matrosov
1,082 Views

Hello,

I'm using Intel Inspector to check my C++ code which is using Intel IPP. I got strange errors "Uninitialized memory access" and "Uninitialized partial memory access" pointing to IPP functions. On the attached screenshot, an error is selected. Both allocation side and read points to the same line of my own source code - imageutils.cpp:23. I also attach the full report.

It seems like the error is caused by an IPP function. Is that true, or am I doing something wrong?

I'm using Intel Inspector XE 2013, Intel IPP 7.0.205, Windows 7 x64, Visual Studio 2010.

Here is VC++ compiler options: /ZI /nologo /W3 /WX- /Od /Oy- /D "WIN32" /D "_DEBUG" /D "_WINDLL" /D "_MBCS" /Gm /EHsc /RTC1 /MTd /GS /fp:precise /Zc:wchar_t /Zc:forScope /Yu"StdAfx.h" /Fp"Debug\ContourRefinement.pch" /Fa"Debug\" /Fo"Debug\" /Fd"Debug\vc100.pdb" /Gd /analyze- /errorReport:queue 

0 Kudos
4 Replies
Peter_W_Intel
Employee
1,082 Views
I recommend to submit & discuss this issue on IPP forum http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-integrated-performance-primitives
0 Kudos
SergeyKostrov
Valued Contributor II
1,082 Views
>>...I recommend to submit & discuss this issue on IPP forum Hi Mikhail, Let's go back to IPP forum, please...
0 Kudos
Chuck_De_Sylva
Beginner
1,082 Views
Mikhail, thanks for the post. I don't however see in your code where you are calling ippInit(). You do call that at initialization correct?
0 Kudos
Mikhail_Matrosov
1,082 Views
Yes, I do call IppInit() in my original project. I also posted a small sample repro-case in the same thread in IPP forums: http://software.intel.com/en-us/comment/1717355#comment-1717355
0 Kudos
Reply